User:TCN888/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title
 * Claude Steele


 * Article Evaluation
 * The leading sentence clearly states the articles discussion on Mr. Steele as a social psychologist
 * It clearly states the major sections of the article including his current job and prior academics leading up to it.
 * The lead is concise in the mention of Mr. Steele's current work
 * All the information within the lead is included in the body of the article; his book, his work on stereotype threat, his research ect.
 * The content within the article is relevant to Mr. Steele; his research, his work, his life both personally and professionally.
 * The contents most recent information is from 2016, there is no content on his life form 2016-present day
 * The article is neutral without any biased information and all viewpoints on his life are not over/under represented
 * The article does not have any statements that persuade the reader due to it being facts of his life.
 * Facts within the article regarding his career are supported by citations and a majority of the citations are directly from Mr. Steels published work
 * The links in the references section are working
 * Yes, the article is well written and is concise and easy to read
 * No grammatical errors noted in the article
 * The article is well organized into Mr. Steele's personal life, career, research, achievements, and awards
 * The article includes one photo of Mr. Steele and it adheres to Wikipedia copyright regulation and it is a profile picture that is placed on the side in a visual appealing way with a brief outline below, no caption.
 * I don't see any discussions on the talk page
 * The article is rated as a stub-class and it is a part of WikiProjects (Biography/Science and Academia, Psychology, and Washington/Seattle
 * The strengths of the article is that is to the point and it addresses all the major factors of his life


 * Sources

Option 2

 * Article title
 * Abandonment (emotional)


 * Article Evaluation
 * The leading sentence clearly defines emotional abandonment
 * The lead however does not include a brief description of the major sections of the article
 * The lead includes a random fact regarding emotional abandonment as a staple of poetry however nothing is mentioned further regarding this point.
 * The content is relevant however not up to date, most recent facts noted from 2016
 * There is a section at the end of the article discussing Borderline Personality disorder however it is not clear why this content is included. Earlier in the article it mentions how thoughts and feelings in both BP and EA are similar, however the section only makes one connection to the main topic of emotional abandonment.
 * The links within the article work
 * The article is easy to read however it is not organized well; the subcategories seem a bit all over the place
 * The article has no images
 * The article is considered a C-class
 * Part of the talk page is considering to start the whole page over because it is a mix of multiple ideas
 * The article is not well developed, it needs better categories, more structure/organization, pictures, and more information with proper sources
 * Sources

Option 3

 * Article title Frances Cress Welsing
 * Article Evaluation
 * The lead clearly states the article will discuss Ms. Welsing as a psychiatrist
 * The article briefly mentions how Ms. Welsing was controversial and on her paper which are both elements of sections within the article
 * The lead is concise
 * The article is relevant, up to date, and is not missing information
 * The article is neutral, not biased in a particular position, and not overepresented/underrepresented
 * The facts are all cited by sources and the links work
 * The sources are not thorough and don't go further into discussion, its a brief fact.
 * The sources are current to the time of her work but there is a gap between 2002 to her death in 2016
 * The article is concise, clear, and easy to read
 * There are no grammatical errors
 * There is one photo of Ms. Welsing with the caption of when it was receiving an award
 * The talk page is controversial and discusses if this psychiatrist is even note worthy enough to have an article about
 * The talk page is in fact a bit aggressive and disrespectful both to the other users and Ms. Welsing herself. They argued back and forth about whether she is notable enough to even have a wikipedia article.
 * The article ispart of Chicago, Biography, and women writers wikipediaprojects
 * The article is rated start class
 * The article is rated start class


 * Sources

Option 4

 * Article title V. S. Ramachandran
 * Article Evaluation
 * The lead clearly states the article will discuss Dr. Ramachandran a neuroscientist
 * The lead briefly mentions the major sections of the article it will discuss; his theories, experiments, and awards
 * The lead is concise and it doesn't include information that is not included within the article
 * The content is relevant and speaks about all his theories and research conducted regarding phantom limb, mirror visual feedback, mirror neurons, ect.
 * The content is up to date and has information from this current year.
 * There is no missing content
 * The article is neutral, there is no bias, and all the viewpoints regarding his work are adequately represented
 * All the facts are backed up by reliable sources, the links work, and the sources are current
 * The article is well written and organized, there is a grammatical error "When an arm or leg is amputated, patients often continue to feel vividly the presence of the missing limb as a "phantom limb" (an average of 80%)" I think that sentence is a run-on and could've be written a lot better.
 * The article has 3 photos; one of Dr. Ramchandran himeself, one in reference to one of his theories, and one with an original mirror box. All 3 photos are captioned.
 * The article is part of 3 wikiprojects; autism, India, psychology, and science and academia
 * The article is rated C-class
 * Part of the talk page discuss Dr. Ramachandran as an expert in court and how what one of the users wanted to summarize violate one of wikipedias policies and would not be allowed in any kind of article.
 * A lot of the talk was about the removal of claims and impressions that were included within the article.
 * A lot of the talk was about the removal of claims and impressions that were included within the article.


 * Sources

Option 5

 * Article title Herbert Kleber
 * Article Evaluation
 * The lead clearly states the discussion of Mr. Kleber as a psychiatrist and substance abuser researcher
 * The lead is very concise and does not discuss other sections the article will discuss
 * The content of the article is relevant to Mr. Klebers career, life, and current popularity. The article is up to date and includes information from the current year. The article doesn't completely have missing information but rather what it mentions is brief.
 * The article is neutral, no bias, no under or over representation
 * The facts are cited with sources that are current and the links work.
 * The article is very brief, no errors, and well organized. I think the article is just short.
 * The article does not have any images.
 * The article is rated a start-class
 * It's part of 3 wikiprojects; biography, medicine, cannabis
 * The talk page is friendly, very few people commented, possibly because its still an upcoming article. One suggestion is to include a section on Mr. Klebers involvement in the 12-step program.
 * The article can include a lot more information regarding his work as a psychiatrist such as any research he contributed to, his work as a professor, and his personal life. I feel as if the article is not complete.
 * The article can include a lot more information regarding his work as a psychiatrist such as any research he contributed to, his work as a professor, and his personal life. I feel as if the article is not complete.


 * Sources