User:TCWIK17/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.). Environmental science

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.) I chose this article, because this is my field of study that I am going into. This matters to me, because it is what I am interested in and I have never been to its Wikipedia page before. My preliminary impression of it was that it was very interesting to see when and why Environmental Science was created.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

I believe that the introductory sentence is a bit too long for my liking. It lists all of the areas that integrate into Environmental Science instead of just an overall idea of what it is. The content on this page seems to be concise with the idea of Environmental Science by giving brief history and topics that are related to today. Everything seems to be up to date as well. There appears to be no bias in this article, just straight forward facts. The sources and references seem to be accurate. I have checked many links that are on the page and they work well and are correlated to the topic. The writing seems professional. There are some run on sentences but for the most part seems to be put together very well. The organization is a bit random, but the overall ideas are helpful. The page is filled with images based on the topic. The talk page has not been used in a bit, but those who have talked are based on suggestions of adding articles or wording things differently on the page. My overall impressions of this article are that it is very helpful in applying well thought out topics to the page, but it could be formatted better and not scrambled.