User:THINKTANKSWORK

After attempting to submit viable encyclopedic information several times here on Wiki it seems that the best policy is total anonymity. A concept that, in this day and age of high speed SNS I find arcane. Attempting FULL DISCLOSURE in regards to who is posting and if they are in fact posting facts about their own work apparently is considered self-promotion and advertising. An artist can recognize when their work becomes something more important than who they are as an individual. If a collective is moderated by people who do not see the importance of new entries in the real fields of information retrieval and analysis combined with a form of imagination that uses careful hypothesis to form specific conclusions regarding national security then what's the point? Are we as a culture in general now as guilty as the failed thinktanks who somehow either lacked the imagination to realize it or were so mired in their self created red tape that the information was edited into oblivion? People have an innate desire to police other people, and will sometimes act from a superior position without weighing properly the toll their decisions can have on the information collective. Perhaps this futuristic true-open-source paradise will make it into the first real A.I. Encyclopedia (c. 2015) To promote anonymity in this day and age is like wearing horse-blinders. It creates tyrants and stalkers. Tunnel vision leads to disaster and closed-mindedness. Traits we must shed if we choose to turn things around on this planet.