User:TJScalzo/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title
 * Queer theory


 * Article Evaluation
 * Stub - It's literally a single sentence!


 * Sources
 * A lot of work would have to go into building this article up. I don't know if I have a clear enough understanding of the topic to do it justice. There are literally no references because it's just one sentence. I wouldn't even know where to start for sources to cover queer theory as an all-encompassing topic.

Option 2

 * Article title
 * Queer heterosexuality


 * Article Evaluation
 * Start - It's got some good content, but it looks like it could do with some revising. The structure is a little odd and the concepts feel like they overlap too much. I wouldn't have to completely rewrite it, but it would be a nice project to revamp this article. I would especially be interested in looking at more recent concepts that connect to the digital/online aspects of "queer heterosexuality."
 * There's some fascinating discussion on this article's Talk page dating all the way back to 2009! I think I would enjoy delving into this topic further.


 * Sources
 * Source 1
 * Source 2
 * Source 3
 * Source 4
 * Source 5

Option 3

 * Article title
 * Queer anarchism


 * Article Evaluation
 * Start/C-class - It has a lot of specific sections that I think are really great. There is a lot of discussion, both old and recent, about how this article's topic is defined. People are arguing it should be renamed to focus on anarchism and queer liberation in a different way. I think this is all really interesting and I would love to look into it further.
 * A lot of the references they're using seem to be specific quotes. This isn't inherently bad, but it makes the references section look very bloated. Not all of their citations use templates to format them properly so I would look into updating them as well.


 * Sources
 * There are quite a few sources already on the page, I would probably start there and see what's missing.