User:TJScalzo/Queer heterosexuality/Textavour Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

TJScalzo


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Queer heterosexuality

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * - nice comments on the idea of queer heterosexuality and how to define it
 * - in a general view --> sections could be split up --> especially addressing the different aspects of the controversy around the term

Lead

Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * yes he's added comments about the controversy around the term
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Yes but it could be split up more for a clearer idea of queer heterosexuality esp to ppl who are know little to
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * yes but could be more clear about what the topics/content of the article is
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * no
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * yes

Content

 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * no
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?
 * yes, the its looking at LGBTQ issues which are underrepresented on wikipedia