User:TKenn2/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Dysbiosis (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dysbiosis#:~:text=Dysbiosis%20(also%20called%20dysbacteriosis)%20is,shift%20in%20their%20local%20distribution.)

The article sources are all human health related; the most recent resource seen at the time date to 2016. The human health component resources could be updated in addition to being broadened in their scope.
 * Article Evaluation
 * Article mostly focuses on human health related dysbiosis. The article could be improved to include dysbiosis from a broader range of topics including plant rhizosphere and other types of microbiomes. Additionally the human health component of the article could be updated using more up to date sources.
 * Sources
 * Sources

plants and human health alternatives:
 * Potential sources to use in editing the article:
 * human health:
 * https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fendo.2021.667066/full
 * https://www.nature.com/articles/s41385-020-00361-8
 * https://www.nature.com/articles/s41564-018-0129-3
 * https://www.nature.com/articles/s43705-022-00094-8

Option 2

 * Article title
 * xenobiotic (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xenobiotic)


 * Article Evaluation
 * Although this article comes up through microbiome topic search, the article doesn't contain much detailed information in reference to the microbiome. The term within the microbiome context could be more clearly defined and expanded.

The sources are limited in their scope and could be updated to include more recent publications. Potential resources to improve the article:
 * Sources
 * https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32124693/
 * https://www.nature.com/articles/s41564-018-0129-3

Option 3
potential sources to use to improve the article:
 * Article title
 * Cancer dormancy (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cancer_dormancy)
 * Article Evaluation
 * The article is rather short and the references could include more up-to-date research, references, and varied sources. The article also offers a section of remaining questions at the time of the article's last update that provide good avenues for ways to improve and expand the article.
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * https://www.nature.com/articles/s41568-020-0263-0
 * https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2111046118?cookieSet=1
 * https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2021.627023/full
 * https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2021.676802/full
 * https://febs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/febs.15626

Option 4

 * Article title
 * Mycorrhiza (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mycorrhiza)


 * Article Evaluation
 * While the article mentions the plant's rhizosphere, there is very limited information in the article of fungal interactions to the other organisms present in the rhizosphere. Although, upon initial assessment, the research in this particular area is limited, the article could be improved by elaborating more on the intra-rhizosphere interactions and the role fungi play in the plant root microbiome.


 * Sources
 * https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/35462155.pdf

Ectomycorrhizae: Their Ecology and Physiology

Option 5

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources