User:TL017/Clay animation/Allieoster17 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

TL017


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:TL017/Clay animation
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Clay animation

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The was no lead at the time of the peer review.

The content added is relevant to the original topic and is somewhat up to date, but it is frequent enough to still be considered relevant for this topic. There isn't any information that doesn't belong or missing necessarily. It would be beneficial to have more information and details. Right now, the content is about three sentences long. I would like to know a bit more about adult-oriented clay animation. The article does not deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps or address topics related tp historically underrepresented populations.

The content added is neutral. There are no claims that are heavily biased. The content added does not push the reader a certain way. It is overall, very neutral and fact based.

The content is backed up by reliable sources, and all the content used is correct with the source information. The sources are current, but they are not by a very diverse range of authors. There are no scholarly sources. The links provided do work.

It is written well, organized, and I did not see any grammar or spelling mistakes.

There were no images added.

Overall, I think the content added will be beneficial to the article. I think there needs to be more detail and information on the topic of the content added, but this is a good start!