User:TMV2020UPRC/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: (link) Intoxication in English law
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate.

I choose this article to evaluate because I thought it was interesting. Also I wanted to know how other people develop in this articles.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Lead evaluation
In this article the lead include an introductory sentence with describe the article topic, but in my opinion should be written in a better way. Also the Lead is concise but for be should have more information and be better organized.

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?

Content evaluation
The content of the article is very relevant to the topic, but have to be more organized. Also it feels like something is missing, exits more information about that topic, studies and things can be added that help the article to be more complete.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Tone and balance evaluation
This article material is very neutral. Also this article don't attempt to persuade the reader, the information are only that, is information to create more knowledge and learn about things like this.

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Sources and references evaluation
The sources and references in this articles are only notes, and is difficult to corroborate. Also only have two links and don't work.

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Organization evaluation
The article is well- written because the information is concise, don't have many difficult concepts so is clear and easy to read and understand. Also have some spelling errors.

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Images and media evaluation
This article don't have any photos, making the article less attention grabbing. It is important that things like these have photos so people who are more visual can be more interested.

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Talk page evaluation
This article is rated as C-class low importance. It is part of the following WikiProjects: WikiProject England, WikiProject Wales and WikiProject law.

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status?
 * What are the article's strengths?
 * How can the article be improved?
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?

Overall evaluation
The article's overall status are the information in that article was split to Voluntary Intoxication in English Law. Move that material to this other article are better because first the topic of this second article sounds more professional. Also this other article is more worked, the last editing in the first article are in June 19 2019 when in the other article have a recent editing. This article's strengths are the form of in which the information is written, because it is easy to understand and does not have many difficult concepts.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: