User:TMV2020UPRC/Radiation oncologist/Esteban15vp Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? TMV2020UPRC
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:TMV2020UPRC/Radiation oncologist

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes, the lead describes the article's topic
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes, the lead offered a brief description of the sections
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No, all the information in the lead is presented on the article
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? Is a concise lead

Lead evaluation
Is a great lead, had an introductory sentence and describe the article topic in a concise way.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? The contente is relevant to the main topic.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? All the content is relevant and well organized.

Content evaluation
The content is organized and had a good structure.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes, is neutral
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No, it's write in a neutral way
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No, the article just offer information.

Tone and balance evaluation
Great! The article had a neutral tone and not tried to persuade the reader.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes.
 * Are the sources current? Yes, the sources are current.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? All links work.

Sources and references evaluation
The article has verifiable and reliable sources to support the writing.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? The content added is clear and concise.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? I can't find any grammatical or spelling errors.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? The content is well organized and all the sections reflect the major points of the topic.

Organization evaluation
The article is very well organized, each of its sections is named and shows a summary of what the content will be.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * What are the strengths of the content added? The article has a very clear and organized structure
 * How can the content added be improved? At the moment I can't find any suggestions to offer