User:TREVORtrbl/Calotomus carolinus/Akaub Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

I am reviewing Trevortrbl's article


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:TREVORtrbl/Calotomus_carolinus?preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Calotomus carolinus

Peer Review
Please answer the following questions in detail addressed to the classmate whose article you are reviewing. Remember this is constructive feedback, so be polite and clear in your suggestions for improving their article. We are all working together to improve the Wikipedia pages for the amazing species.


 * 1) First, what does the article do well? (Think about content, structure, complementing the existing article, writing, etc.) it is pretty organized for the most part.
 * 2) Is there anything from your review that impressed you?
 * 3) Any turn of phrase that described the species in a clear way?
 * 4) Check the sources:
 * 5) Is each statement or sentence in the text linked to at least one source in the reference list with a little number? yes, but there is no reference list yet.
 * 6) Does the article only discuss the species the article is about? yes it does.
 * 7) Is there a reference list at the bottom? Is each of those sources linked with a little number? No there is no reference list.
 * 8) What is the quality of the sources? I think they are pretty qualified sources, but i need to find more sources, possible with more info about its eating habits and other topic like that.
 * 9) What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article? find more articles, figure out ways to apply these sentences to the existing article, and maybe fix my wording to make my sentences stronger.
 * 10) Why would those changes be an improvement? so this will al help my parts of the article to blend in, but make the article more interesting as well.
 * 11) Is the article ready for prime-time and the world to see on Wikipedia? If not, how could the author improve the article to be ready? noooo not yet haha. i believe i need to make these improvements as well as find more improvements along the way.
 * 12) What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article? make the sentences in adding on blend in with the existing article to make a fluent sounding article in the end.
 * 13) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article?