User:TREVORtrbl/Calotomus carolinus/Kats50 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

TREVORtrbl


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:TREVORtrbl/Calotomus carolinus


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Calotomus carolinus

Peer Review
Please answer the following questions in detail addressed to the classmate whose article you are reviewing. Remember this is constructive feedback, so be polite and clear in your suggestions for improving their article. We are all working together to improve the Wikipedia pages for the amazing species.


 * 1) First, what does the article do well? (Think about content, structure, complementing the existing article, writing, etc.)
 * 2) Is there anything from your review that impressed you? I like how this person has an organized draft and how it is categorized properly. Why Thank you! I tried to keep it clean cut so i can edit and copy and paste the rest on the existing article.
 * 3) Any turn of phrase that described the species in a clear way? The phrase that described the species in a clear way is "And the name Panuhunuhunu is a unique name for this type of parrotfish, because most of the parrotfish species are known as uhu in Hawaii3 (3. thegardenisland) they are used for food sources and make a yummy lunch or dinner."
 * 4) Check the sources:
 * 5) Is each statement or sentence in the text linked to at least one source in the reference list with a little number? The statement has numbers but is not linked I see, I almost missed this, thank you!
 * 6) Does the article only discuss the species the article is about? Yes, the article only discuss the species i tried to keep it that way haha.
 * 7) Is there a reference list at the bottom? Is each of those sources linked with a little number? Yes, there is a reference list at the bottom but they are not linked with a little number Ill go ahead and figure that out.
 * 8) What is the quality of the sources? The quality of the souses looked good to me ill try my best to find some more sources
 * 9) What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article? I would say don't forget to link statements to the reference and number your reference at the bottom. I found this website which I am not sure if you saw https://www.fishbase.de/summary/Calotomus-carolinus.html maybe this would help with the anatomy and morphology. Thank you! This was really helpful.
 * 10) Why would those changes be an improvement? These changes would be an improvement because it would be easier to see what statement is referenced to which. If you didn't see this article yet, I hope it helps you :) Thank you :)
 * 11) Is the article ready for prime-time and the world to see on Wikipedia? If not, how could the author improve the article to be ready? This article isn't ready yet but it is almost there. Just have to fix minor details and it is ready :) alright sweet! almost there haha.
 * 12) What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article? Adding more information if possible and link the reference
 * 13) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? Yes, setting up my references and linking as well as organizing mt article better I cannot wait to read your article (or the changes to your article) thank you for this, and i hope you have a great rest of the week!
 * 14) Trevor Ko