User:TSO1D/archive6

Back
So you're back! Welcome. :) --Illythr 09:00, 6 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Allow me to sign my name to this welcome note. Good to see you again. Dahn 15:10, 6 November 2007 (UTC)


 * I subscribe, too. Dpotop 15:20, 6 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Myself as well. PētersV 17:04, 6 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Welcome back! It's been too long. Biruitorul 00:39, 7 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Bine-ai revenit. În timpul pauzei tale lucrurile s-au liniştit pe plaiurile transnistrene, ca urmare a cazului de arbitrare, care cred că conţine informaţii utile pentru tine.--MariusM 10:58, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
...we needed that. Raymond Arritt 01:58, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for November 5th and 12th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:25, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

User:Anittas
Hi, I was away for 1 week. I've noticed today that Anittas was blocked. I suggest to open a RfC.

My relationship with Anittas during the latest period was not good, because he was uncivil (with other people, not with me, but anyway it was under my nose). Although I do understand that he talks 100 times more than he means, it still is a pretty unpleasant talk. I was very harsh towards him during the last time I talked with him. Perhaps too harsh. I was going to reply him with a list of things I hold against him. During my time away I realized that none of those issues taken separately are serious, but there are many of them. Basically, it all rotates around Anittas' predilect method of calling people Muntenian/etc or other ways in a pejorative way. At first I thought it is a problem of education. Then I realized Anittas simply got used to this and does not realize that this makes other people uncomfortable. Anyway. My personal suggestion would be to keep the block for talk pages (where 100% of his uncivil behavior occurred), but let him edit the encyclopedia (as he was not uncivil during edits). The motivation for the block I suggest: "please, stop using WP as a chat space". After some time, he could apply for unblock, but I do not want to speculate when and how. Let me emphasize again: all his past bad record was about his behavior in talk pages and in his own user space. I do not remember him vandalizing encyclopedia pages or doing bad faith edits, on the contrary. So, I suggest the block to be specific to the area where there is a problem. :Dc76\talk 16:54, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Noticeboard of the wikipedians from or interested in Moldova
Thank you for adding yourself to this list. The title of the noticeboard is perhaps one of the worst titles that exist in WP, and I am the author of that monstrosity. Is there a Wiki-project Moldova? Maybe this noticeboard can be redirected/renamed there... We lack many basic things: In short, thank you for joinging the Sisifian club. :) :Dc76\talk 17:07, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
 * we don't even have a good idea about what pages exist about Moldova, what pages are needed, there is no invetory
 * we need people interested in creating pages for localities, and I mean pages better than "X is a village in Moldova". Personally, I was interested in creating a list of all localities: by administrative division and by name (alphabetic).
 * other stuff that will emerge as high priority once a good inventory of existing articles is made

Moldova
I noticed your work on this article. Although I am sure you are doing this, please do not forget to:
 * move all information that you erase into "sub-articles". If you find the information not enough reliable, add . But don't erase technical data, such as number of inhabitants, altogether. It is very hard to bring such numbers again.
 * I do understand the reason for erasing "See also", but then you might want to link those articles inside the text, so that one can find some link to them from Moldova (obviously, Moldovan wine or Moldovan cuisine do not have to link, but foreign relations I think can be and should be).
 * if you need help, let me know. I can, for example, compare two versions, and add info that was eliminated from Moldova to sub-articles, and then we can read those, and clean them in their own turn. Or other help that you find needed. Let's divide the work and have more of it done.
 * Anyway, thank you very much for your interest in the subject.:Dc76\talk 18:29, 16 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Thank you very much for your detailed explanation. It does help to see the whole plan, and it is a good one. I'll help little by little, time permitting. For spelling and style, here is an excellent guy: User:Thiseye. He even enjoys it.:Dc76\talk 14:08, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the welcome!
Sotnik (talk) 06:16, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Balti

 * Hello there. I do not see any need to discuss the spelling of Balti in English. Unless you can provide an official source stating that the name of the Balti city is spelled otherwise in English language, it simply cannot be a matter of a debate. As for moving the talk page with all the sensitive issues, I agree with you, especially with those that were stated by me and further deleted by someone (have no time to check who did this). Could you help me please with moving the talk page, as you seem to know how to do this. Otherwise I will do it myself, but it might take more time. Thanks again and have a nice WE. Moldopodo (talk) 08:59, 17 November 2007 (UTC)Moldopodo


 * Ok, I understood the move function, and have already tried it. But indeed it does not work with Balti, as other pages exist already. Will you make the request to move then? By the way, the same applies to Chisinau and other Moldavian localities.  Thnaks in advance if you do at least part of requests. Moldopodo (talk) 16:03, 17 November 2007 (UTC)Moldopodo


 * It's done, thanks. However, I do not see any controversy or issue for discussion here. It's a simple matter of correct spelling in English language. Moldopodo (talk) 16:58, 17 November 2007 (UTC)Moldopodo

To TSO1D: Hi, I made some edits to the intro + 2 sections of Bălţi. Could you, please, copyedit that part. Thank you.:Dc76\talk 16:46, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much. please, also change Elizavetovca --> Elisaveta in the infobox. (i don't do it to avoid creating edit conflict). I will not edit more today this article. BTW, I'm sorry, lately I am busy and don't have enough time for WP... you see, Wp is not something I can do 5 minutes at a time, so I am very reluctant to start if I know I only have 10-15 mins to give. :Dc76\talk 17:31, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
 * please, see this, law # 764 /2001 ("Lege privind organizarea administrativ-teritoriala a Republicii Moldova"). You have to download the .zip file, unzip it, and read the law in .doc format. See annex 2. The good thing is that they mentain it up to date, e.g. they made some minor changed in 2004 and 2005 (some villages became commune or vice-versa), and they introduce the changes in the 2001 text (i.e. it is the 2001 with all the subsequent revisions). The name "Elizavetovka" is how the village was called in Russian during the Soviet period, so naturally there would be references to it occasionally in press, even Romanianized version like k-->c. But these are not official acts. :Dc76\talk 19:05, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
 * And by the way, I was also wrong, it sis Elizaveta.:Dc76\talk 19:07, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Hi, I have a technical question. How does one rename a category: e.g. Balti to Bălţi? There is no move function... :Dc76\talk 16:20, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

quick question
mind my asking, but how/where were you notified on the edit conflict in Carlos Latuff?  Jaakobou Chalk Talk  15:32, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Administrator
You are an administrator? Why don't you protect the page who reflects the truth? Mulţam'--Cezarika f. (talk) 16:02, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

3rd strike
It's alright, i was just correcting as he actually uses a gin bottle (and references this by calling Noddys friend 'Gordon'). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kanyewes 05 (talk • contribs) 18:32, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for November 19th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 10:46, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

The report on Administrator intervention against vandalism
I think a meditation and suitable action by admins is need to settle down these series of edit disputes, incivility and wikistalking. As you know, User:Patriotmissile reported a vandalism by Sennen goroshi, but to be correct, he got the wrong place to appeal for the matter because Patriotmissile is relatively a newbie. The edit warrings are not simply conflicts between nationalistic views and Sennen goroshi. The original problem was caused by User:Jjk82 with his unverifiable bogus links and unrelated citations, so I restored from his edits to the last revision. However, Sennen goroshi's been witkistalking me ever since Sep. As the result Sennen reverted my edits and others to provoke disputes without any consensus.

In addition, as the process, he recently removed my opinions at an unfinished discussion and his talk page. As I point out his serious POV issue regarding animal cruelty of Korean director, Kim Ki-duk, he simply reverted my comment to ignore and chases my edits. I think his opinion like below are problematic.

+Animal Cruelty have there been any more documented cases of this barbaric director committing acts of animal cruelty? or were these disgusting cases of barbarism only in this one sick movie?Sennen goroshi (talk) 06:44, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Besides, he is not in a position to threat and give possible blocks to other editors as if he were an admins. He is the one to initiate this problems. On contradictory, Sennen has warned other people on the other side and reverts civil advices and comments from them. As the result of his ongoing disruptions on Korean related articles, several editors are enraged by his edits.

Could you closely look into Special:Contributions/Sennen_goroshi and Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RR. I could've reported this directly to WP:ANI, but I don't know the place is right place or not. Thanks. --Appletrees (talk) 18:47, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Regarding Bălţi
Regarding Bălţi, you seem to be one of the editors edit warring, so I'm not about to protect it, just in case. I'll keep an eye on the article though, and ban any editors who start warring, so a page lock shouldn't be needed. Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 01:49, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Regarding unblock and AN/I thread
Hello, as you are the unblocking admin I'd like to let you know I have given my 2 cents on the block. Happy editing. Knowledge Of Self | talk  10:40, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Sorry, the same applies to me, I should have contacted you first instead of unblocking him. Also, when I said that the block was mistaken, I did not mean that no vandalism had been committed, but only that the punishment was a bit too fast and too harsh. I mean disregarding the self-revert, there was only one case of silly vandalism, and that should have resulted in a warning, and an immediate indef block seemed pretty extreme. Anyway, you're doing a great job fighting vandalism, just remember that some of these users who make a few silly edits now may become interested in the project and could just want to experiment, so it's usually best to warn the users before blocking them (which I see you are usually doing in most cases). Good Luck! TSO1D (talk) 15:21, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I understand where you are coming from, but the way I saw it is like this:
 * Brand new user whose first edit is to vandalize Jimbo's page. Ignore the self revert for a second, how in the world does a newbie find Jimbo's page first? He then blames it on his sister.
 * The page the user created and then had deleted wasn't a simple db-bio, rather it was an atttack page. Doesn't look good to me so far.
 * Vandalizing the Melon page and then blaming it on his brother this time. AGF can only be followed so far imo.
 * I'm not mad or upset about the unblock, I don't rule Wikipedia and I welcome everyone to review my actions. I just would have preferred a consultation with me first, so that I could give a my reasons as stated here and on AN/I of why the block was placed. If anyone dis-agreed with the block after that, then I would unblock the user myself with an apology. In this case it doesn't much matter anymore. Thanks for the message I do appreciate it. Knowledge Of Self | talk  18:40, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Moving of monarchy articles
I noted your comment at the 3RR noticeboard; however, I'm confused by what you mean by "others" who've said there's no consensus. Only one person, as far as I can see, says there's no consensus. Who are these others? And, further, what is a consensus if not general agreement on which of various options has the most merit? --G2bambino (talk) 02:42, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
 * If a 2/3 majority (10-5) isn't a consensus? What would be a consensus? 11-4, 12-3 etc. I'm not being sarcastic TSO1D, I'm just trying to understand things. I'd like to note - I offered a final Poll on Options #1 & #7, but TharkunColl rejected the idea. GoodDay (talk) 02:48, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Re:Above and comments on British monarchy
Salut TSO1D. Thank you for you comments on British monarchy. I somewhat agree with what you have said but this and other related articles have been talked to death and that "one" person above is what people in my field of study like to call a "filibuster" in the sense that any and all proposals will be "defeated" because of the actions of one person. The only way things have gotten through in these articles is by editors invoking WP:IAR because this "one" person's actions are preventing any and all progress to improving the articles and the encyclopedia. Avec nat...Wikipédia Prends Des Forces. 04:22, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Salut TSO1D, Well of course there were more than one opposition to the move (but the others are willing to compromise or were indifferent), however, people were notified of the proposal to move 16 or 17 pages, and a notice had been placed on the article page itself informing people that there was a discussion going on. A supermajority (10/15 or 66.6%) of the people that responded, supported the proposal. Although we can't exactly define it as consensus and Wikipedia is not a democracy, I find that when dealing with such article, especially ones with disruptive editors, like the one in question, this is the only avenue that progress can take, other than that we can go nowhere just because an editor decides to pull a filibuster. Not only that, but all the other related article have been moved without much opposition, although I don't have an opinion on whether it should be "Monarchy of X" or "Xian/ish/er monarchy" but I'm a person who likes to standardize things and to have consistency, and so this is the only article that has been moved and then reverted by a disruptive editor, who clearly will not heed or compromise with other editors (as seen here, in which he was willing to duplicate the article but creating it with a different name). This editor is disruptive, and he has been blocked before for 3RR four times, and incivility three times. This clearly shows that he is not willing to budge and probably has made it clear that he will continue to be disruptive, therefore becoming an impediment any progress or change to the article and the encyclopedia as a whole. Avec nat...Wikipédia Prends Des Forces.  10:35, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, I myself am a sysop, so are you suggesting that I could move it? Avec nat...Wikipédia Prends Des Forces.  15:34, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Okiedokie. Avec nat...Wikipédia Prends Des Forces.  15:52, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
 * or as my friend would say "Da, e mai bine asa" (I think I said it correctly...correct me if its wrong...) Avec nat...Wikipédia Prends Des Forces.  15:54, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for November 26th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:43, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Monarchy of the United Kingdom
I wonder sometimes TSO1D; if editors had called for all the Commonwealth realm articles to be moved to X monarchy, would thing have gone more smoothly. Would Tharky have cooperated. GoodDay (talk) 16:02, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
 * On further reflection, I think Tharky's main problem was having the British page lumped together with the 15 other Commonwealth realm pages (fearing it showed equality, which they legally are). I regret that Tharky couldn't resolve his ownership issues with British related articles. GoodDay (talk) 16:21, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for December 3rd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 10:12, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for December 10th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:07, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for December 17th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 19:41, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Merry Xmas
I wish you a very Merry Christmas and Happy New Year! -- R O   A M A  T  A A  | msg  18:08, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for December 26th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 14:00, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Bălţi articles
Can you give an opinion about the using of official name of Bălţi? Ungurul (talk) 17:37, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Your statement
Please confirm where I personally attack User:Ungarul with a diff, otherwise I think you are mistaking. Thank you.--Moldopodo (talk) 20:47, 30 December 2007 (UTC)Moldopodo
 * Everywhere, you were also very disruptive as well. Ungurul (talk) 20:49, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Do you think Moldo will stop or start again his war against Bălţi?Ungurul (talk) 21:17, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Podo comes from Podolia - Transnistria.--Ungurul (talk) 21:22, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Huh? What does the Podo thing have to do with... anything? As for the former question, I hope both of you can quite down for a bit. Also, attacking each other on ANI or elsewhere is only likely to result in consequences against both of you. TSO1D (talk) 21:27, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXII (December 2007)
The December 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:52, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 2nd and 7th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:29, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 14th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:06, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 21st, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 00:41, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 28th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 04:24, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIII (January 2008)
The January 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:17, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for February 4th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:47, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Addition to protected page
Since you have protected Balti from edits can you add this?:


 * Bălţi steppe - a grassland in northern Moldova

Balti (disambiguation) is a duplicate page I am redirecting to Balti and it includes this item. Thanks. —  AjaxSmack   22:16, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Military history coordinator selection
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by February 14! Woody (talk) 10:57, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi, Could you, please, delete this. I split a template (Transnistria/Territory) into 2 (administration and conflict), but when moving the name, forgot the word "Template:". Sorry. I have corrected now, but I can not delete. Thank you very much. :Dc76\talk 17:14, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Done TSO1D (talk) 17:42, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much.:Dc76\talk 19:08, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for February 11th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 14:03, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for February 18th and 25th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:48, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Bender
I've seen in London (disambiguation) that articles about cities were titled either "Name, Province" or "Name, Country". Since the status of Transnistria is disputed, I thought it's better to put Bender, Moldova. But if you say the correct is Bender (city), I'll have to agree. (You're an administrator and I suppose you know better these technical details)Xasha (talk) 10:47, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

I've made a request according to the instructions on the page linked by Bogdan.Xasha (talk) 01:34, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Comment desired on article change
Hello. You previously expressed concern with the treatment of "polarization" expressed in the Hillary Rodham Clinton article section. This material has been reworked to try to address such concerns. And mention of "polarization" has been removed from the lead section. Please give it a read now and comment on Talk:Hillary Rodham Clinton as to your reaction. Thanks. Wasted Time R (talk) 22:54, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIV (February 2008)
The February 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 08:20, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 3rd, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:38, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

speedy deletion
Template:Moldova (could you, please, monitor other contribs by the same editor)Dc76\talk 16:23, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 13th and 17th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 02:28, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Comment again desired on article change
Hello again. You were one of two admins previously commenting on WP:SYN and related issues regarding the Hillary Rodham Clinton section. I've made a series of revisions to it to try to satisfy these concerns. If you have a chance, please give it a read now and comment on Talk:Hillary Rodham Clinton as to your reaction. Thanks. Wasted Time R (talk) 02:45, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 24th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:19, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 31st, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 22:10, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXV (March 2008)
The March 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:00, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Bender, Moldova mediation
A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Requests for mediation/Bender, Moldova, and indicate whether you agree or disagree to mediation. If you are unfamiliar with mediation on Wikipedia, please refer to Mediation. Please note there is a seven-day time limit on all parties responding to the request with their agreement or disagreement to mediation. Thanks, Anthøny 22:37, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Request for mediation not accepted
This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to perform case management. If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.

Signpost updated for April 7th and 14th, 2008.
Sorry, it seems that the bot quit before completing its run last week. Here is the last two weeks' worth of Signpost. Ralbot (talk) 09:18, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:18, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Greater Slovenia
Take a look at Articles for deletion/Greater Slovenia (2nd nomination). Slovenians try to delete the article Greater Slovenia as if the concept never existed. Please participate in the discussion, the article has been thoroughly sourced. -- Imbris (talk) 20:49, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 21st, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 16:42, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVI (April 2008)
The April 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:36, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 2nd and 9th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:48, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 12th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:51, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Join the new Moldovan Wines project !
Hello, maybe you will be interested in development of the Moldovan Wine articles. If yes, I am pleased to invite you to join it on the Project:MoldovanWines project page. Best regards, --serhio talk 11:21, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Tighina
I think the article Bender, Moldova should be moved to Tighina. See also my last comments in the talk page of the article. --Olahus (talk) 18:44, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 19th and 26th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:41, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVII (May 2008)
The May 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:24, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 2, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:04, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 9, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:52, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 23 and 26, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:34, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 30, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 04:25, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVIII (June 2008)
The June 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:39, 5 July 2008 (UTC)