User:Taguzman1/Rheotaxis/Yesseniaml Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

User:Taguzman1


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Taguzman1/Rheotaxis


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Rheotaxis

Evaluate the drafted changes
'''Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?'''


 * The information presented is relevant to the selected topic. I would recommend going over the structure of some sentences, specifically within the 3rd paragraph, as there is opportunity to connect/join some sentences.

'''Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?'''


 * The article and examples presented are neutral and without bias.

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?


 * In the "Schooling fish" segment of the article the first sentence mentions that magnetic field and noise have an impact on shoaling fishes, I think you should expand and give examples of how.

'''Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?'''


 * The citations that do have a link or doi are working, some do not references do not have these so I am assuming the information came from books. If not, it would be beneficial if you updated those references.

'''Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?'''


 * I do not identify any bias.
 * I'm not entirely sure if in-text citations should be following APA style, if so I know of a good resource that could help: https://apastyle.apa.org/blog

'''Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added?'''


 * I believe that all information included was up to date.

Other comment/suggestion:


 * Just an FYI, I noticed that a sentence was repeated twice with different references on the third paragraph.