User:TaliaSanders06/Greenhouse millipede/Nhaggan Peer Review

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The article was well written and adds a lot of relevant content about the topic. The information appears to be up to date and the sources appear to be reliable and back up the information provided in the article. The tone of the article is neutral and informative and doesn't provide information that would sway the reader into a bias opinion.