User:Tallahatchie/Mississippi Delta/Chckn nug Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Tallahatchie


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Tallahatchie/Mississippi_Delta?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Mississippi Delta

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead

The lead hasn't been edited yet.

Content

Good start with the Hot Tamales and Chow Mein sections of your food heading. You have more to write, but the stuff that you do have looks good in my opinion.

Tone and Balance

There is no bias that I can detect in your article -- it sounds very neutral

Sources and References

You have added a lot of references that look credible

Organization

Within the food heading I would make each dish its own subheading just so each dish gets the distinction it deserves. A few grammatical things: "It is up for debate as to their origins" could be rewritten to "Its origins are debatable," and "and are attested to around that time period" could be changed to "are attributed to that time period."

Images and Media

There are no images yet, but you can certainly add images of each dish you are discussing.

Overall Impression

You are off to a great start! I think the addition of the new section is a good choice and you have a lot of material that you are going to add. Good job!