User:Tamara Omar/Chromite/Iheanyiarizor Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Tamara Omar


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Chromite
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Chromite

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead

Lead paragraph does not appear to have any changes. The draft includes only alternations to health and environmental impacts.

Content

Content added is very informative and addresses several aspects neglected by the original article. The information provided seems to be relatively recent and lacks miscellaneous data.

Tone and Balance

The draft acknowledges both positive and negative aspects of the topic by analyzing the environmental and health issues of chromite. Viewpoints are adequately represented through the citation and further explanation of related content in the sub headings. The draft tend to incline the towards the negative impacts of chromite and the essence of better conservation of aquatic wild life.

Sources and References

Sources are valid and support arguments. Citations are present after facts are provided and outline further knowledge not presented in original article.

Organization

The content is adequately presented but lacks a subheading fo the citations presented. Content is properly arranged with a lack of miscellaneous information. However, there is a lack of content table which is understandable considering draft only analyzed a certain part of the article.

Images and Media

No images were included in the draft.

Talk Page Discussion

The talk page has a significant amount of discussion and relate generally to topic being discussed

Overall Impressions

Generally, A decent draft providing adequate information with proper citation. However, addition of heading title for references should be considered before providing list of references.