User:Tamurray22/Sit-in movement/Catason Peer Review

General info
(provide username)Tamurray22,
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Tamurray22/Sit-in movement
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Sit-in movement

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)


 * Organization- The major edit is very clear and concise giving details like when the sit-in occurred and also another strategy used by the students. Tone and Balance- The are no claims that seem to be biased towards one side in the changes.
 * Content- The content of the major and minor edits are very relevant to the topic. For example, there is an edit added to the article that talks about how the sit-ins in Greensboro influenced protests like the Montgomery bus boycott.
 * Sources and References- The major edit could use one or two references that could help give more context to the paragraph. For example a link to an article talking about the "Jail, No Bail" Strategy could be a bit helpful in giving more context to a reader.
 * Overall- These drafted changes in the sandbox were good and looking forward to see more. Great points so far but a little more digging would really help push the draft.