User:Tanguangyao88/sandbox

Protest against demolition and removal in small towns in China
Protest against with demolition is the practice that related to the negotiation between folks and government in the People's Republic of China. Demolition is involved in economical development, changing the status of township welfare and processing urbanization. In the process of demolition, some evictees protest with the government due to unfulfilled requirements. For example, the government's officials pay different amount of compensations to evictees, allocate different sizes of apartments. Evictees, who sticky in emotion about ancestor could be another reason leads protest with the government's official. The context illustrates the details of dealing between evictees and government's officials, and how the processes in both perspectives.

History
Since China established opening market economy in Dec 18 of 1978, urbanization was treated as the one of strategy that state's development. Rapid economy growth leads requirement of houses renovating. Local governments needs to increase fiscal revenues via selling lands resources.(To commercialize lands and make it become commodities.) In this background, two different types of evictees appeared. First, push evictees happen because of force demolition, for example, some constructors remove houses without having consent with the owners, therefore, unequal power relationship made folks protest against officials. On the other example of pull evictees, folks seek for a better life welfare, education, heath care encourage them move from the original place.However, high living expenses lead the lack of supporting a place in new place. As the result, inequality leads protest against with governments. Some of them even went to Beijing to consult with central government.

Processes
[1] Many Chinese citizens who lived in the rural area were looking forwarded to have the sense of Urban’s life because to have a large land would not able to bring them a high-quality life, such as better education, better hospital care, and a better food’s supplies. In the traditional Chinese society, farmers related to the corps to survive; however, limited foods would only able to provide the basic life expense supply. In this particular situation, most of evictees pursuit urban people although they were required to abandon their homelands. In the end of 2010, although officials established the unified plans of new village’s plans; however, the compensation didn't fulfill these evictee’s demanding. For example, the average unit’s price was from 7,0000 Yuan to 12,0000 Yuan was sold out so fast; however, these evictees had no enough chances to support it. Eventually, these people have to find a job in city in order to treat with the difference in price. Inequality usually stands as the factor of protest because most of the protestors use the protest as the way of pursuing their rights or typically as their needs. From the perspective of evictees, they believe that the government promised them to immigrate to urban; as the return, they will gain better welfare to be a “Urbanian.” The article thereby illustrated “That township officials had diverted the allocated funds toward sub-legal luxury real estate development. As the result, evictees won’t be able to afford the places in cities, yet, they lost the original places in rural area. I will use the above article to depict my paper as the reason that protest happened between evictees and government, and how collectively protest has a common purpose when encountering the same situations. [2]Social injustice leads the protest between an individual with the government. However, it’s very hard to define either is injustice or not. For example, many nail householders require high compensations, that is the government will replace the house as it actual size, but once nail householders knew the news that the region will renovate, they start adding the areas without applications, as the result, they will gain more compensations of their households. Although the governments sometime treat these nail householders as the unlimited greed, it is the consequence that there is no compromise between them. From the evictee’s perspective, they believe government causes them no places to live; in contrast, government thinks it’s the process of urbanized development. Hard negotiation caused the protests from evictees, people use ways to against the government in order to maximize the benefits. However, unlike a decade ago, the Chinese government has established the strict policies that prohibited forced demolish. Along with the country’s development, civil rights become one of the significant purpose that government should to respect citizen’s rights. Nail household is the object who is easier to launch the protest, they could have many reasons, such as old house may include emotions between family, or the legacy from ancestors; however, these are the conditions where they are able to negotiate with the government. Essentially, the government once fulfill the demands the citizen’s needs, it can be the easy issue to solve out. Protest happened most time because inequality, how to be balance therefore will be the significant mission for evictees. I will use this article as the way to illustrating the individual case when the demolition events happen to the evictees. In detail, I will use the examples of individual cases that happened in the small towns of China to reveal the situations.

[3]A number data indicated the dissatisfy of protestors, urban relocation, forced evictions, or rural land seizures are the processes of development, from the end of 1970, China opened its market to outside, therefore, the consequences came out. The Protest is the issue that happens in every country. In China, according to the research, peasants were the vulnerable groups that involve in “Land rights”. Along with the rapidly developed economy, urbanization requires the extension to the outside regions; however, if the government is not able to fulfill the requirements of these evictees, protests existed no matter came from an individual or collectively. The government, therefore, found the solutions to compensate these evictees, such as financially supports or allocate the apartments, some of them were even paid by both. Despite these compensations had been allocated, many reasons caused a certain of people dissatisfy, for instance, they compare to other neighbors, different assessments of the house’s value. As a result, unfair usually cause them to walk to the street and protests, some were even sent the petitions to Beijing. Protest against demolition, therefore, has many details, such as some peasants were waiting for their houses to be relocated because the results maybe change their life as the return, many nails household sticky their emotions for the house especially for the older generations. Hence, to separate evictees into different groups and consult with them to find their needs is the keyway of balancing it. I’ll use the first article combined with this article to illustrate the ramifications under development, and the way they dealing with government to protect their rights and benefits.