User:Tanmanfalcon/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.) Koa'e Fault Zone

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

It related to my Hawaii Topic of the Koa'e and Hilina Fault Zones and fault propagation and geometries of the area.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The article follows the correct layout, with an introduction, a features and a mechanical section. There are a decent number of figures, but very few references. The article as a whole is very tailored toward a geologist mind, highlighting the mechanics of the fault in it's own section, which is quite different from articles of other non-science related things. Maybe a different section title?

There are a number of references at the bottom of the page, but only three citations mentioned in the text. The references do not have hyperlinks so their authenticity is harder to prove.

There is no talk page, but it is listed as a low-importance topic, explaining why there is no talk page.

~