User:Tasfiaxnawal/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: Telehealth
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate: I chose this article to evaluate because it falls under my category of sector articles to choose from. It focuses on resource delivery remotely during COVID-19.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes, the lead includes a concise sentence to introduce the topic.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes it does.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No it doesn't.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? It is pretty concise for such a broad topic.

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content up-to-date? Yes, it includes resources retrieved in 2020.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? All sections are telehealth related.
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? Yes, it deals with equity in healthcare for people that don't have direct access to it. It doesn't directly talk about underrepresented populations or topics.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral? Yes it is.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No, not really. All all factual based.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No, they're pretty spread out in terms of information.
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No it doesn't.

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes they are.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? There are a good variety of journals, books, articles, and websites used thoroughly throughout the article.
 * Are the sources current? There is a wide variety, but yes some are current.
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? There are global perspectives, MD citations, and many more.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes they do

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes!
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? Not that I've noticed.
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes, very clear subheadings.

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? A couple.
 * Are images well-captioned? Yeah they are short and clear.
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? Yes they do, they are linked appropriately.
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? They are just off to the side.

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?


 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? It is straightforward with definitions and facts, instead of delving into the reasons why it's needed.

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status? Overall, it's rated a B and of high importance
 * What are the article's strengths? The strengths include that each heading is mentioned and described to some degree.
 * How can the article be improved? The article can be improved if there were more specific examples of each telehealth sector provided.
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? There is more work that can be done to expand upon each subheading.