User:Tasuki49/sandbox

Eddy-current testing (also commonly seen as eddy current testing and ECT) is one of many electromagnetic testing methods used in nondestructive testing (NDT) making use of electromagnetic induction to detect and characterize surface and sub-surface flaws in conductive materials.

History
Eddy current testing (ECT) as a technique for testing finds its roots in electromagnetism. Eddy currents were first observed by François Arago in 1824, but French physicist Léon Foucault is credited with discovering eddy currents in 1855. ECT began largely as a result of the English scientist Michael Faraday's discovery of electromagnetic induction in 1831. Simply put, Faraday discovered that when when there is a closed path through which the current can circulate and that a magnetic field passes through a conductor (or vice versa), an electric current flows through this conductor.

In 1879, another English-born scientist, David Edward Hughes, demonstrated how the properties of a coil change when placed in contact with metals of different conductivity and permeability, which was applied to metallurgical sorting tests.

Although there were a number of encouraging developments in the 19th century, much of the actual development of ECT as an NDT technique for industrial applications was carried out during World War II in Germany. Professor Friedrich Förster while working for the Kaiser-Wilhelm Institute (now the Kaiser Wilhelm Society) adapted eddy current technology to industrial use, developing instruments measuring conductivity and sorting mixed ferrous components. After the War, in 1948, Förster founded a company known today the Foerster Group where he made great strides in developing practical ECT instruments and marketing them.

Eddy current testing is now a widely used and well understood inspection technique for flaw detection, as well as thickness and conductivity measurements.

Frost & Sullivan analysis in the global NDT equipment market in 2012 estimated the magnetic and electromagnetic NDT equipment market at $220 million, which includes conventional eddy current, magnetic particle inspection, eddy current array, and remote-field testing. This market is projected to grow at 7.5% compounded annual growth rate to approximately $315 million by 2016.

ECT principle
In its most basic form — the single-element ECT probe — a coil of conductive wire is excited with an alternating electrical current. This wire coil produces an alternating magnetic field around itself in the direction ascertained by the right-hand rule. The magnetic field oscillates at the same frequency as the current running through the coil. When the coil approaches a conductive material, currents opposed to the ones in the coil are induced in the material — eddy currents.

Variations in the electrical conductivity and magnetic permeability of the test object, and the presence of defects causes a change in eddy current and a corresponding change in phase and amplitude that can be detected by measuring the impedance changes in the coil, which is a telltale sign of the presence of defects. This is the basis of standard (pancake coil) ECT.

ECT has a very wide range of applications. Because ECT is electrical in nature, it is limited to conductive material. There are also physical limits to generating eddy currents and depth of penetration (skin depth).

Applications
ECT finds applications in both tubing and surface applications.

Detection capabilities to defect type in tubing
Several types of defects can be detected in tubing with varying degrees of success:


 * Inner-diameter (ID) pitting: excellent
 * Outer-diameter (OD) pitting: excellent
 * Axial cracking: acceptable, but limited
 * Circumferential cracking: acceptable, but limited
 * ID corrosion: excellent
 * OD corrosion: excellent
 * Defects at tubesheet: acceptable, but limited

Sizing capabilities to defect type in tubing
Several types of defects can be sized in tubing with varying degrees of success:


 * Inner-diameter (ID) pitting: good
 * Outer-diameter (OD) pitting: excellent
 * Axial cracking: good
 * Circumferential cracking: unsuitable
 * ID corrosion: good
 * OD corrosion: excellent
 * Defects at tubesheet: good

Suitability according to material
ECT is limited to being used on non-ferromagnetic materials.

ECT on surfaces
When it comes to surface applications, the performance of any given inspection technique depends greatly on the specific conditions — mostly the types of materials and defects, but also surface conditions, etc. However, in most situations, the following are true:


 * Effective on coatings/paint: yes
 * Computerized record keeping: partial
 * 3D/Advanced imaging: none
 * User dependence: high
 * Speed: low
 * Post-inspection analysis: none
 * Requires chemicals/consumables: no

Other applications
ECT is also useful in making electrical conductivity and coating thickness measurements, among others.

Other eddy current testing techniques
To circumvent some of the shortcomings of conventional ECT, other eddy current testing techniques were developed with various successes.

Pulsed eddy current
Conventional ECT uses sinusoidal alternating current of a particular frequency to excite the probe. Pulsed eddy current (PEC) testing uses a step function voltage to excite the probe. The advantage of using a step function voltage is that such a voltage contains a range of frequencies. As a result, the electromagnetic response to several different frequencies can be measured with just a single step.

Since depth of penetration depends on the excitation frequency, information from a range of depths can be obtained all at once. If measurements are made in the time domain (that is, by looking at the strength of the signal as a function of time), indications produced by defects and other features near the inspection coil can be seen first and more distant features will be seen later in time.

When comparing PEC testing with the conventional ECT, ECT must be regarded as a continuous-wave method where propagation takes place at a single frequency or, more precisely, over a very narrow-frequency bandwidth. With pulse methods, the frequencies are excited over a wide band, the extent of which varies inversely with the pulse length; this allows multi-frequency operation. The total amount of energy dissipated within a given period of time is considerably less for pulsed waves than for continuous waves of the same intensity, thus allowing higher input voltages to be applied to the exciting coil for PEC than conventional ECT

One of the advantage of this type of testing is that there is no need for direct contact with the tested object. Testing can be performed through coatings, sheathings, corrosion products and insulation materials. This way even high-temperature inspections are possible.

Saturation eddy current testing
This inspection is used on partially ferromagnetic materials such as nickel alloys, duplex alloys, and thin-ferromagnetic materials such as ferritic chromium molybdenum stainless steel.

The saturation probes contain conventional eddy current coils and magnets. The magnetic field of the magnet saturates the material. Once saturated the relative permeability of the material drops to one. The strength of the magnets used for saturation is critical in this technique. Weaker magnets will not saturate the material and will produce a high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR).

The application of a saturation eddy current technique depends on the permeability of the material, tube thickness, and diameter. .

Eddy current array
Eddy current array (ECA) and conventional ECT share the same basic working principles. ECA technology provides the ability to electronically drive an array of coils arranged in specific pattern called a topology that generates a sensitivity profile suited to the target defects. Data acquisition is achieved by multiplexing the coils in a special pattern to avoid mutual inductance between the individual coils. The benefits of ECA are :


 * Faster inspections
 * Wider coverage
 * Less operator dependence — array probes yield more consistent results compared to manual raster scans
 * Better detection capabilities
 * Easier analysis because of simpler scan patterns
 * Improved positioning and sizing because of encoded data
 * Array probes can easily be designed to be flexible or shaped to specifications, making hard-to-reach areas easier to inspect

ECA technology provides a remarkably powerful tool and saves significant time during inspections.