User:Tavleenbhatia/Global journalism/Gracemavko Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Tavleenbhatia
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: Global journalism

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Yes, the lead accurately explores the content added.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * The topic sentence encompasses each element of the article topic.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * There isn't major sections yet other than a definition, so I think yes it does.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * No.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * No.

Lead evaluation
10/10

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * I think in later additions, more background on the scholarly work behind global journalism will be a nice addition to the page.

Content evaluation
9/10

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favour of one position or away from another?

Tone and balance evaluation
10/10 It is made clear in the lead that this is a conceptual exploration of a perspective, so the tone that is represented is a display of that.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Sources and references evaluation
10/10

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Organization evaluation
10/10. Easy to understand for an average Wikipedia user! Great way to explain the topic and back up with sources, but make easy to understand.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Images and media evaluation
This article needs visual aid! I definitely recommend adding pictures.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved?

Overall evaluation
8.5/10! I think this is a great addition to Wikipedia, but is in need of pictures and more information.