User:TaylorCaffs/Evaluate an Article

Mars
(Provide a link to the article here.)

I like the topic.
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

== After looking through this article, I have come to the conclusion that it is a strong, well-written article. The grammar and structure of the page was in good standings. The editors do not take a bias stand stating opinions about the planet, only facts relating to Mars. So, they pass for coming from a neutral stand. The editors included sources for each one of the facts written about the planet. These sources are from creditable science journals and, some are from NASA. So, when it comes to citing its' sources, the editors did a good job. The sub topics were in an organized order and written well with descriptions and sources. The lead did a great job at defining Mars, in detail. I would say that this is a reliable wikipedia page that was written well. ==

(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)