User:Taylormapstone/Mairin Johnston/Promisepitman Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Taylormapstone


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Taylormapstone/Mairin Johnston


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * N/A

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead: I thought your lead provided a thoughtful, detailed, and succinct summary of the article. All of the major subjects were covered in a concise way. Great job there!

Content: The content seemed up to date, well-researched, and relevant. You painted a solid picture of Johnston's work in the sphere of feminism and writing. I understand that she played an impactful role in the fight for women's reproductive rights in her corner of the globe.

Tone & Balance: I sensed a neutral tone throughout. Nothing stood out to me as skewed or influencing to a reader.

Sources & References: You guys had a lot of great sources available! I checked out each of them and saw all of the information reflected in your article. Great job sifting out the facts that were among some of those personal narrative articles. The sources were current and most of the links work (the 6th one is not available).

Organization: Great organization. Did not notice any spelling or grammatical errors. Easy to read and understand.

Overall Impressions: I thought you guys did a good job! I understand there's limited media out there on some of these individuals so I appreciated all of the information you were able to find. If more sources can be uncovered to add more nuance, obviously that would be great but from what you guys could find it's a good summary. It was comprehensible and trustworthy.