User:Tbronson16/Barbara Low (biochemist)/CPandCP Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Tbronson16
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Tbronson16/sandbox

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * There currently is not a lead available in the sandbox.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * There currently is not a lead available in the sandbox.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * There currently is not a lead available in the sandbox.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * There currently is not a lead available in the sandbox.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * There currently is not a lead available in the sandbox.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Yes, all of content is relative to the biochemist Barbara Low.
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * The two sources were both published in 2019 so yes, very up to date content.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * All content up to this point appears to be relevant to the life of Barbara Low.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Yes the content added appears to solely be factual.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * No, no political views or unsupported thoughts are written.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * With the publications, I hope that the plan is to eventually flesh out some of them and explain the work that was accomplished.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * There is not an active attempt to persuade the reader in this article.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * I think that more sources should be sought after due to the amount of information being demonstrated versus the amount of sources being used to gather it.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * The sources do contain a lot of information, which is what allows the editor to write so much despite only having two sources.
 * Are the sources current?
 * Extremely current, both sources were published in 2019
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * Yes links work well, bringing the reader to other relevant pages.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Very much so, yes
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * No
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * Very well organized, easy to navigate.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * No
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * No images
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * No images
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
 * No images

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * Yes I think the information found is a strong start.
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * Relevancy, it having the cites of less than a year ago makes the contributions up to date and the information very pertinent.
 * How can the content added be improved?
 * It can reference more sources.

Overall evaluation
==== I think that the article is coming along very nicely. I think instead of saying "from wiki" at the start of sentences it could be cited in your references and just move forward from there. I think that the information you have found is relevant and adds to the history of Barbara Low well. With more sources the article could really have some more weight as far as authenticity goes. Adding an image could also really help the page come alive more. It looks great so far! ====