User:Tbui24/sandbox

= Article Evaluation =


 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? I don't think everything in the article is relevant to its topic. The article began with the history of mental health in China. This is where different mental health institutions established were mentioned. Then the article continued to explore the current state of mental health in China. This is the section where different evidences were provided to justify the increasing concern of mental health in China. One of which was stigma related to cultural and folk beliefs. The final section was about Chinese military mental health. This topic distracted me because it doesn't explain what factor contributed to the mental health status of the overall population in China. I don't feel like Chinese military mental health is coherent to the overall article because it's not a factor that have the potential of impacting mental health, rather, it's another area of concern for mental health that should have its own dedicated article.
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? I feel like the article is somewhat is bias. The article argues that mental health is a growing issue in China and claims that the Chinese government's approach in providing mental health services is ineffective. Even though the article doesn't explicitly states it, the editor seems to have a negative attitude towards the Chinese government and the lack of mental health services they provided. Throughout the article, it seems like the article primarily antagonized the Chinese government.
 * Are there viewpoints that are over represented, or underrepresented? I feel like the Chinese government's viewpoints are underrepresented. In this article, the editor focused on the lack of services provided for individuals with mental health, but it doesn't explain why the Chinese government do what they do in regards of providing this requested services.