User:Tcamilo192/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Chamber music

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose the article because it was assigned to me for class. My initial impression of the article was that it was fair, the information is not bad but there could be more to make it better.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The lead in the article is quite lacking. It does not include a proper, cited definition of chamber music, which considering that's the topic of the article, is quite disturbing.

Personally, I wasn't a fan of the organization of this article either. It was largely grouped by composer, but I feel it would have been better organized by use of periodization, and then composers within that period.

In the Franz Schubert section in which my group was assigned, there was a lot of German terminology that was not defined in the article. Instead, it used links to other articles which to me severely interrupts the flow of reading. The section was also quite opinionated, calling Schubert "the darling of Vienna," and using other descriptors of his work rather than addressing them through musical terminology. This section is also quite short in comparison to other sections, such as the Beethoven section.