User:Tchang2/Sebastes chrysomelas/BioJR Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

I am reviewing Tchang2's and Natalie.erb's article on Sebastes chrysomelas.


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Sebastes chrysomelas


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Sebastes chrysomelas

Evaluate the drafted changes
Overall, the information that is there is good! I would consider adding more to the behavior, distribution, and reproduction sections if possible. On the last section, "Genetics," the information did not seem too relevant to your article. I did not fully understand what the first statement meant either. If possible, I would add more information to that section to make it more complete and try to connect the information there to other parts of your article.

The layout and images on your article are great and very informative! I believe that in most Wikipedia articles, the Contents section is to the far left of the main article, so I would consider swapping it with the image right next to it.

In general, I would avoid using pronouns as much as possible so that there is no ambiguity in the article. There were a few moments where I had to pause to think of what a certain pronoun was referring to.

By the way, I accidentally edited directly on your article before I knew how to properly peer review... so sorry! You may find some notes throughout the article, so feel free to disregard or update your article as you'd like!