User:Tcjohnson11/Conflict management styles/Jstnbxtr Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Taylor Johnson
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Tcjohnson11/Conflict management styles

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? If the heading style is removed, the lead would appear before the site content links (so that it would be formatted like most other Wikipedia articles. i.e. no header is needed for the lead).
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? The into sentence should mention styles of conflict management and not just conflict management.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? No. This section should be expanded to include more of a general overview of the content of the article.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? The lead needs more deal.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date? yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? see below

Content evaluation
I recommend adding information to the background section pertaining to scholars who have published important works on the subject. In the background section you also state that "Conflict Management dates far back in history". How far is that? I recommend citing a more specific time, or rewriting this sentence. Also, I would add the name of the scholar who developed the conflict management styles listed. As it currently reads, these are the only definitive styles for conflict management. While they may be the most main steam. I'm would imagine that others exist. The same is true for the steps for managing conflict. I'm sure other approaches exist. Additional details could be added to each of the steps listed for conflict management, as well. Furthermore, I recommend either changing the name of the sections titled "Studies on Conflict Management" to something like "Cross cultural conflict management", or adding additional study to the section.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? see above. The Styles of Conflict Management and Steps to Managing a Conflict seem to only show one perspective.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? see above. The Styles of Conflict Management and Steps to Managing a Conflict seem to only show one perspective.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? no

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? yes
 * Are the sources current? yes
 * Check a few links. Do they work? yes

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? I think the sentence "Managing conflict is pivotal in laying the way for the amount of tension caused in the conflict, if a conflict is poorly managed it can cause more issues than the original conflict." could be cleaned up. As written, I think the sentence's meaning is ambiguous and the sentence is a bit cumbersome.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? none noted
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? yes

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media. N/A


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? N/A
 * Are images well-captioned? N/A
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? N/A
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?N/A

Images and media evaluation
I recommend adding links to the following: American Management Association, Management International Review, Turkey, all authors/scholars added.

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? yes
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject? yes
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles? yes
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable? no, see above recommendation.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? yes
 * What are the strengths of the content added? The content is well organized
 * How can the content added be improved? See above recommendations.