User:Tdeppong/Charles Davenport/Natalielarimore Peer Review

The user does a good job of updating new information to the page. They also maintain a neutral perspective on the subject. It is evident that the user did a lot of research for the subject as they added a lot to the description. There are also decent sources used for the information that was updated.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)