User:Tecasm/Loretta H. Cheeks/Oabrown23 Peer Review

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing? Tecasm


 * Link to draft you're reviewing User:Tecasm/Loretta H. Cheeks:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The lead section of the article provides detailed information. There is a good use of references. I would fill in the remaining sections and I'm sure that it will be good to go.