User:Technical 13/Logs/RPP

This is a log of all Request for Page Protection nominations made by this user using Twinkle's RPP module.

If you no longer wish to keep this log, you can turn it off using the preferences panel, and nominate this page for speedy deletion under CSD U1.

April 2013

 * 01:06, 9 April 2013 (UTC) requested semi-protection of
 * Pictogram voting support.svg Semi-protected&#32;for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Ekabhishektalk 03:06, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
 * 17:02, 11 April 2013 (UTC) requested pending changes of
 * Pictogram voting support.svg Semi-protected&#32;for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:47, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
 * 18:15, 12 April 2013 (UTC) requested full protection of
 * Pictogram voting support.svg Fully protected&#32;indefinitely.  INeverCry   18:25, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
 * 11:48, 16 April 2013 (UTC) requested semi-protection of
 * Pictogram voting support.svg Semi-protected&#32;for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen &#124; talk 12:04, 16 April 2013 (UTC).
 * 1) negotiated a 3-day semi-protection on
 * Pictogram voting comment.svg Note: See: Protection policy. Some input by MissBono would be appreciated. I for one see no reason for protection, especially of the talkpage. Something like what has happened happens all the time on wikipediaLectonar (talk) 13:05, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
 * I'd prefer my pages and subpages were protected. There is a reason, 'cause otherwise, the same IP will be bothering me for the rest of my stay at Wikipedia and I'd have to move away from it.  Miss Bono   (zootalk)  13:40, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
 * In this case, the user concerned is much more sensitive to be affected by this kind of vandalism, which does not look likely to stop. There is sufficient vandalism, and sufficient cause, because I seriously suspect this could very adversely affect the user under question if not protected. TheOriginalSoni (talk) 13:44, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
 * I will leave the decision to another admin; for me there is nothing particularly problematic here. If it is the same IP, he will be blocked (again). Protection is too heavy handed here, when dealing with one perpetrator. And keep in mind that it would keep well meaning editors from editing the talk page too. And yes, I am aware of the underlying problems, as I have revdeled some content concerning the user. Lectonar (talk) 13:48, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
 * I am not sure there will be many IP's trying to contact her, but that is just my personal opinion. I do point out these sections to show her sensitivity towards vandalism - 1 2 3 TheOriginalSoni (talk) 13:56, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, I have seen all that...as I said: I will leave the decision to another admin. All I can say is: when editing Wikipedia you are bound to come across something like that, and we can not shield everybody from that perpetually. I am German and an admin: can you imagine what is thrown in my direction? Lectonar (talk) 14:03, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
 * I can imagine Lectonar... so, there's nothing you can do??  Miss Bono   (zootalk)  14:12, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Pictogram voting comment.svg Note: There have been a couple personal attacks by this shared IP against this user as well as User:Moxy; however, I believe based on my understanding of it, that PC1 protection may be enough to protect this user's slightly more sensitive nature to these kinds of attacks. Technical 13 (talk) 15:24, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
 * I agree. TheOriginalSoni (talk) 15:27, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
 * me too :D  Miss Bono   (zootalk)  15:38, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
 * I was thinking of that, and would have applied pending changes,...unfortunately, it does not work for userspace. (Or I am dumb to find it). Lectonar (talk) 16:39, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
 * No I do not think you are too dumb to find it. Although none of the PC documentation pages mentions namespace restrictions, viewing the namespace drop-down on Special:StablePages reveals that PC seems to be only available on "(article)" and "Wikipedia" leaving me no other option than to support a request for a temporary 3-day semi-protection of the user talk page as was originally proposed. I've explained to Miss Bono the unfortunate side-effect that no IP editors will be able to leave her messages there even if there is a genuine and legitimate message for her.  If this short term semi-protection was to be granted, I would be willing to help her set-up a sub-page for IPs to be able to leave her messages and/or a note in her edit-notice offering them some other agreeable method to communicate. Thank you for your time. Technical 13 (talk) 17:33, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Pictogram voting support.svg Semi-protected&#32;for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I bite for that, WP:IAR and all the rest. Mind that this still goes very much against my wikiethics, so to speak, and I do not want to set a precedent here. It is rather against the policy, imho. But I think after my replies most admins would have stayed away anyway. Lectonar (talk) 17:41, 25 April 2013 (UTC) And as an afterthought: the subpage you want to set up will, of course, not keep away vandalism. And after the protection expires, the same problem will present itself. I am almost sure that virtually no admin will implement permanent semi-protection on user-talkpages. The subpages are another thing, but even there we should have proof of heavy vandalism before protecting. Lectonar (talk) 17:50, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Very much appreciated. Let us all pray that the attacker gets the point and refrains from any further attacks.  :) Technical 13 (talk) 17:52, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

August 2013

 * 15:40, 24 August 2013 (UTC) requested unprotection of
 * Pictogram voting oppose.svg Declined There are over 10,000 transclusions, so I think that this qualifies as a high-risk template. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:22, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you for taking a moment to review my request . Off to submit my edit request now. :) Technical 13 (talk) 17:30, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

September 2013

 * 13:48, 13 September 2013 (UTC) requested unprotection of
 * Have you asked the protecting admin, User:Ks0stm, if he's willing to unprotect? Mark Arsten (talk) 15:10, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I think it should be protected in some form (either semi or full) due to its high level of visibility with new/inexperienced users, who are less than likely to be enchanted when the template they were trying to use for requesting help has been vandalized. I'm willing to defer to the judgement of other administrators, however. Ks0stm  (T•C•G•E) 03:24, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Ok, now Pictogram voting support.svg Semi-protected Mark Arsten (talk) 04:45, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you, and semi-protection was what I had hoped for. I didn't realize I hadn't specified that.  Thanks again and happy wikiing! Technical 13 (talk) 13:58, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

October 2013

 * 18:03, 1 October 2013 (UTC)‎ requested pending changes on
 * Pictogram voting info.svg Already protected. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:00, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 11:49, 30 October 2013 (UTC)‎ requested template protection of
 * Pictogram voting support.svg Template protected Mark Arsten (talk) 12:18, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

November 2013

 * 1)  02:18, 1 November 2013 (UTC)‎ requested template protection of
 * Pictogram voting support.svg Template protected Mark Arsten (talk) 02:35, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
 * 16:14, 17 November 2013 (UTC)‎ requested template protection of
 * Pictogram voting support.svg Template protected 20k transclusions. Mark Arsten (talk) 23:17, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
 * 18:56, 19 November 2013 (UTC)‎ requested template protection of
 * Pictogram voting support.svg Template protected Mark Arsten (talk) 19:00, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Pictogram voting comment.svg Note: This request was posted in the wrong section → Aza Toth 19:02, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
 * 02:17, 26 November 2013 (UTC)‎ requested template protection of
 * Pictogram voting support.svg Template protected Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  12:43, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
 * 02:34, 28 November 2013 (UTC)‎ requested unprotection of
 * 1) * Automated comment: This page appears to have already been unprotected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I NotifyOnline 02:37, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Pictogram voting info.svg Already unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:42, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
 * 22:25, 29 November 2013 (UTC)‎ requested semi-protection of
 * Is there a reason that this should be exempted from the prohibition against preemptive protection? Mark Arsten (talk) 11:31 pm, 29 November 2013, Friday (1 month, 30 days ago) (UTC−5)
 * Pictogram voting oppose.svg Declined, I can't think of one. Mark Arsten (talk) 11:54 pm, 30 November 2013, Saturday (1 month, 29 days ago) (UTC−5)

January 2014

 * 03:44, 2 January 2014 (UTC)‎ requested pending changes on
 * Pictogram voting oppose.svg Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. There is currently only 1 IP involved. Armbrust The Homunculus 04:03, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * 02:08, 2 January 2014 (UTC)‎ requested template protection of
 * Comment That's not really a good reason to request protection for a template, which has only 1 transclusion yet. (Diff is protected because it has more than 9,000). Armbrust The Homunculus 02:22, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Pictogram voting delete.svg Withdrawn by requestor Technical 13 (talk) 03:51, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * 13:38, 8 January 2014 (UTC)‎ requested template protection of
 * Pictogram voting oppose.svg Declined There is an admin prepared to implement the request if necessary. -- John Reaves 11:59 am, 8 January 2014, Wednesday (20 days ago) (UTC−5)
 * 00:58, 9 January 2014 (UTC)‎ requested template protection of
 * Pictogram voting support.svg Template protected&#32;indefinitely. Technical 13 Please let me know when you're done and I'll restore the cascading protection. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:09, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
 * , it is still claiming to be cascade protected when I go to edit it. Must be used in one of the other templates on the page and cascading through that template to this one. Technical 13 (talk) 04:30, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
 * It's transcluded on around 6000 pages any of which could be doing it, so unless there is an easy way to find out which one. You might need to do it the old fashioned way. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:38, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
 * While it might not be the only one, I'm guessing Template:Editnotices/Page/Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items. Technical 13 (talk) 04:54, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Actually, looking at this there are quite a few. It's going to be better to make a protected edit request cos I'm not going to remove some (most) of them from Cascade-protected items. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:13, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
 * 20:09, 9 January 2014 (UTC)‎ requested unprotection of
 * Have you asked the protecting admin, to consider unprotecting? Mark Arsten (talk) 3:19 pm, 9 January 2014, Thursday (19 days ago) (UTC−5)
 * 05:10, 12 January 2014 (UTC)‎ requested template protection of
 * Pictogram voting keep.svg Done Courcelles 1:00 am, 12 January 2014, Sunday (17 days ago) (UTC−5)
 * 22:37, 20 January 2014 (UTC)‎ requested unprotection of
 * 1) * Automated comment: This page appears to have already been unprotected. Please confirm.— cyberbot I NotifyOffline 22:52, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Pictogram voting info.svg Already unprotected by administrator .. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:09, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
 * 20:11, 20 January 2014 (UTC)‎ requested template protection of
 * Pictogram voting support.svg Template protected Mark Arsten (talk) 03:51, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
 * 14:58, 23 January 2014 (UTC)‎ requested template protection of
 * Pictogram voting support.svg Template protected (I assume requesting that the talk page be protected was a mistake?) Mark Arsten (talk) 20:51, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
 * , it was indeed. Technical 13 (talk) 19:12, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
 * 16:35, 23 January 2014 (UTC)‎ requested template protection of
 * Pictogram voting support.svg Template protected Mark Arsten (talk) 20:36, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
 * 19:25, 24 January 2014 (UTC) supported lowering the protection level as nominated by at 17:43, 24 January 2014 (UTC) to template protection on
 * Pictogram voting keep.svg Done, protection level reduced. SlimVirgin (talk) 20:10, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
 * 01:23, 25 January 2014 (UTC)‎ requested template protection of
 * Pictogram voting support.svg Template protected Mark Arsten (talk) 06:54, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
 * 18:54, 28 January 2014 (UTC)‎ requested template protection of
 * Pictogram voting keep.svg Done SlimVirgin (talk) 03:00, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
 * 22:03, 28 January 2014 (UTC) requested template protection of
 * Pictogram voting support.svg Template protected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:40, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
 * 18:55, 29 January 2014 (UTC) requested template protection of
 * Pictogram voting support.svg Template protected Mark Arsten (talk) 22:25, 29 January 2014 (UTC)