User:Tedder/betacommand amendment

Request to amend prior case: Betacommand 2
Initiated by  tedder (talk) at 23:24, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Case affected :


 * Clauses to which an amendment is requested
 * 1) Principle 1
 * 2) Finding 2
 * 3) Remedy 3


 * List of users affected by or involved in this amendment
 * (initiator)


 * Confirmation that the above users are aware of this request
 * Username2 (diff of notification of this thread on Username2's talk page)
 * Username3 (repeat above for all parties)

Amendment 1

 * Link to principle, finding of fact, or remedy to which this amendment is requested
 * Details of desired modification

Statement by your username
Betacommand has begun providing very popular per-project reports of lists of unsourced BLPs. These are being placed off-wiki, and involve a bit of tedious work to supply them to the given projects. While Betacommand has shown difficulty playing with others, especially with regards to his bots, there's no good reason he shouldn't be allowed to write a bot to place these unsourced BLP lists on project subpages.

This gives Betacommand a great way to prove that he can be a valuable (bot)contributor to Wikipedia without immediately having a bot that interacts directly with users. I propose Betacommand be allowed to run approved bots in Wikipedia: and Wikipedia talk: namespaces.

related links:
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Betacommand
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Betacommand_blocked_for_sockpuppetry
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Editing_restrictions

Statement by other editor
{Other editors are free to comment on this amendment as necessary. Comments here should be directed only at the above proposed amendment.}

Amendment 2

 * Link to principle, finding of fact, or remedy to which this amendment is requested
 * Details of desired modification

Statement by your username (2)
{Statement by editor filing request for amendment. Contained herein should be an explanation and evidence detailing why the amendment is necessary.}

Statement by other editor (2)
{Other editors are free to comment on this amendment as necessary. Comments here should be directed only at the above proposed amendment.}

Further discussion

 * Statements here may address all the amendments, but individual statements under each proposed amendment are preferred. If there is only one proposed amendment, then no statements should be added here.

Clerk notes

 * This section is for administrative notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).