User:Tedvogel/Penghu 1/Ptama003 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (Tedvogel)
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Tedvogel/Penghu 1

Lead
The lead is concise and clear as it describes the article's topic. Although it is concise, it provides enough detail for the reader to understand.

Content
The content added is relevant to the topic as it gives information on the classification portion of the topic. The content appears to be up to date as the citations are from more recent years.

Tone and Balance
The content is neutral. There are no claims provided that seem to be biased towards a particular position nor do they try to persuade the reader. The only thing may be the the statement of "This conclusion has been supported" as it sounds a bit more like an argumentative paper towards that conclusion.

Sources and References
All the content is backed up by reliable sources that support all of the information that was given in the draft. These are also good sources since they appear to be current. The links given were also valid.

Organization
The content is well-written as it is clear and easy to read. There are a few grammatical issues as well as sentence structure issues. The content is well organized as the sections help distinguish between topics.

Overall impressions
Overall, the content that was added was well written and improved the overall quality. It makes the article appear more complete. The organization of the content was also a great way to make everything clear. It was all very informative. Something that could be improved would be some grammatical issues as well as the longer sentences. I would try to split the longer sentences up to make them more clear to the reader.