User:Teniad/Tityus (Titian)/Spod010 Peer Review

General info
Teniad
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Teniad/Tityus (Titian)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Tityus (Titian)

Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
Everything included in this draft was relevant to the painting, but I do feel like certain sections could be shortened in order to focus more of the readers attention on the paining. Specifically the background on the artist Titian. While interesting, you already include a link to the wiki page about the artist. Rather than restating the information, I would talk about how that information is relevant to the specific painting. For example: how does the evolution of Titian's style apply to this specific painting?

Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
Everything so far is neutral and well cited. These suggested edits does not read apply any biased reading to the painting and strengthens the draft as as a neutral and well researched approach. My only note is with the term "sends him to hell" in the Artwork section, I would change this to either saying they kill him, or send him to "the underworld" or "Tartarus", the idea of "hell" is a very modern thing, and in the context of the myth background this word would not have been used.

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
Like mentioned above, I think too much time has been spent discussing Titian's own background rather than discussing the painting. Maybe you can discuss more about how the commissioning of the painting, or maybe how Titian would have been exposed to this story. I think you have all the basics outlined in your draft and all that is left is to expand on the topics you presented.

Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
The citations are great, everything is cited properly, and works to support the claims and ideas present in the draft.

Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
All of the resources listed are from reliable places, and the sources appear to be neutral.

Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added?
My biggest tip would just be to expand on what you have already begun working on. I think you have all the relevant information needed on the myth behind the piece, but I am curious if there was a specific reason why it was created or what stylistic choices in the composition make it clear that it belongs to Titian.