User:TerryJamesBoling

Okay, here goes, [the beginning of the Publishing of Nu Physics [also called New Physics and generally called by the Greek Letter, nu, as V Physics], 50 years of Work & Research in Physics & Mathematics.

Be back shortly, almost daily, for addition of pre-publishing excerpts into the man who broke all the laws of physics and mathematics to solve the Unified Field Law.

Believe, or not.

Truth Will Out! [Shakespeare]

Terry

(C) 1980 Terry James Boling ALL RIGHTS RESERVED permission to reproduce, in part, but not in whole, granted provided that the Author's name appears on all copies containing any content derived herefrom. Permission to reproduce in entirety must be granted by the Author in writing! Notations should include the reference: "Nu Physics," 2014 Terry James Boling, [CyberSongs, South Philly]. That's a standard college reference for Research and other papers, particularly English at the "Research & Critical Reasoning" course level and above. Just do the right thing, put the reference in and avoid plagiarism.

[rewrite this with titles and captions and sections/subsections]

Bolings Equation(s):

[should I introduce the main equations right away? I should wait until one of the universities publishes me first I think]

Biographical

Terry James Boling began studying Subatomic Particle Physics at 15 years old in South Philly High. Dr. Carp mentored and tutored him for the 2 years he attended high school.

An older equation won't hurt though, and we can discuss its full meaning:

Nu=CG

What does it mean?

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c5/NuGradientBoling.png

Okay, I see I'm going to have a difficult time uploading images of my nu math symbols, so, let me start with something simple:

The errors in mathematics due to false assumptions. Let me give you a simple one. Imaginary numbers. They say that negative numbers, when squared, always result in a positive number, however, a number of the form -4,-4,-4 in x,y,z, is real, not imaginary, and it lies equally negative 4 units from every point of origin. But why did we assumer that the point of origin was 0? That was the error. The origin is at 0 for Cartesian Systems, which, I'm regret to inform you Rene Des Cartes, is simply not true. The Earth, for example, is not at position 0,0,0 in out Solar System, because it's some 100 million miles, or so, from another point of origin, the location of the Sun, the major gravitation object in our solar system. Therefore, the origin of the center of the Earth with respect to all other things in our solar system is generally 100 million miles, that is, zero plus 100 million miles from the radial point at the core of the Sun. To adjust mathematics for this "Anomaly," we simply state that no part of the Earth is allowed to occupy space negative to the r or ray of the Sun's center in any direction. Which means that the Earth can only approach zero as the origin of the Sun's space, and touch only the surface, therefore, all surfaces of both can, at best touch, and this we consider the true point of origin at any point on the surfaces of either. Another way to look at it is to envision that the the three orthogonal axis with the Sun as the point of origin for the Earth is a corner where 3 points of the surface of the Earth touch the three points x,y,z of the axis where the Earth never enters a negative number space.

Now, all squares are positive, both in number and in there root, regardless of all other considerations. And, amazingly, all cube roots are positive. If we continue this line of reasoning up to 5-Dimensions, then all 5 variables of our 5-Dimensional Space are positive, with a corner having 5 attributes, not sides, but attributes, Motion, Time, Length, Width, & Depth. In other words, the universe and all things in it are real, not probable, which agrees with what Einstein thought, felt, and said. One problem solved, more to come, more errors in mathematics and physics to be corrected.

Spin, as I said before, in Quantum Theory, is a wrong definition; there is no doubt of this because Spin has infinite values and there really is no negative spin in reality, there is only opposite directions, which can be denoted as negative, but the Spin, itself, is not negative as we conceive of negatives in a straight line, but in direction of Spin only, and it is certainly not +/-1/2. Spin is allways +{some value} with its orientation being in a certain Direction. The Directional Derivative confirms this easily. And that Direction may have a negative number, but never a negative value, especially not in Mathematical Calculations, like Integrals and Differentials, it can be denoted as Opposite in Direction and in some instances, but only in some instances, as negative, but not in all instances, such as the ones that incorporate the correction to our notions of positive and negative in Nu Physics and Nu Mathematics. This is part and parcel of Nu Mathematics, the true New Mathematics, not the currently misnomered one, again, an erroneous concept built upon erroneous idea(s).

You can see where this is leading: all things in existence are postive when it comes to objects, from at least 2-Dimensions on up.

With that said, I will now attempt to create an article and definition for the encyclopaedic event.

Well, Widipedia wants a Peer Review [Publishing in a recognized Journal] and that will take a few months to get done], so, for now, the Article is pending that review. I will submit through certain University Peers and it will be published after review within, I'd say, about another year. I'm off now to contact my peers for that review.

Δ

Is normally called "del" and stands for the Greek letter Delta. I am about to introduce a new math symbol called "InDel" for inverted Delta and it looks a lot like the Gradient Symbol, which is an inverted delta, however, I do not see the Gradient among the mathematics symbols here. And the symbol indel is an inverted delta with additonal components. Each component signifies attributes of the new symbol as based on and applied to the del symbol, the gradient symbol. Not unlike Gauss' "bag" as a circle, in perspective an ellipse, circling the integral symbol in perspective. This means the integral is a "closed integral." Similarly, indel has additions which mandate it is also a closed integral and another addition which mandates that it is also a Vector. In composition then, this symbol will represent a vector of 5-Dimensions. This is crucial to the mathematical proofs I am submitting for review and as my Doctoral Thesis.

Terry