User:Tesb1983/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Notes of Debates in the Federal Convention of 1787

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose to evaluate this article because it was a topic I found interesting to read about.

Evaluate the article
Lead Section

The article titled "Notes of Debates in the Federal Convention of 1787" satisfies all the aforementioned requirements. It being with a sentence that introduces the topic concisely and successfully describes the article's contents. This article successfully provides background context as well as an explanation of the significance of James Madison's notes. The lead does not contain and additional information not referenced in the article and is very concise and informative.

Content

The article's content is directly related to the topic. It describes the background and influence of James Madison's notes from the Federal Convention. To my knowledge, the article is up to date. While this article serves as a summary and description of Madison's notes it lacks the content of those notes. Since this is a summary and description of what Madison's notes were and their legacy "Wikipedia's equity gaps" is not prevalent.

Tone and Balance

This article is neutral and serves as a description of Madison's notes. It does not demonstrate bias for Madison nor does it advocate to support or reject the content of his notes. The article does not serve to promote a particular viewpoint. Simply, it seeks to describe the significance and legacy of Madison's notes during the Federal Convention.

Sources and References

This text was composed from neutral and reliable informational centers (universities, etc,.). It fully represented all points of view and provided several references demonstrating the author's research foundation. The sources the author cited were reliable - albeit one was stronger than the other. He cited two sources: a New York Times article and a book. While commenting on the legacy of Madison's notes, the article cited an historian's opinion about the consequences of Madison's notes. While accurate, there might have been other sources that would have provided the author with a variety of opinions that the author could have used to demonstrate the different opinions on Madison's legacy.

Organization and Writing Quality

The article was written concisely, accurately, and clearly. The author gave the article a good flow and summarized the topic nicely. They also provided a great summary of James Madison's life, education, and activity in politics.

Images and Media

The author did not add any media to evaluate.

Talk Page Discussion

The talk page does not have much discussion. The author expresses that this was their first article and another member complimented their work.

Overall Impressions

This article is a good summary of Madison's notes. It is clear, concise, and well cited. The article could be expanded by more information relating to the content of Madison's notes and additional sources. Overall, the article is a great summary of the topic.