User:TessGoldenthal/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title:
 * White defensiveness
 * Article Evaluation:
 * The content is relevant to the article topic and it is written with a neutral tone. Claims are cited and the citations look reputable. The article could have more information to back up its points. Additionally, the "types of expression" section could be expanded upon.
 * Sources:
 * 1) DiAngelo, Robin. White Fragility : Why It’s so Hard for White People to Talk About Racism. Beacon Press, 2018.
 * 2) Kiely, Brendan, et al. The Other Talk : Reckoning with Our White Privilege. First edition., Atheneum, 2021.
 * 1) DiAngelo, Robin. White Fragility : Why It’s so Hard for White People to Talk About Racism. Beacon Press, 2018.
 * 2) Kiely, Brendan, et al. The Other Talk : Reckoning with Our White Privilege. First edition., Atheneum, 2021.

Option 2

 * Article title:
 * Allyship
 * Article Evaluation:
 * The content is relevant to the article topic and it is written with a neutral tone. Claims are cited and the citations look reputable. The article provides a criticism section, which I think is important to show multiple perspectives on what allyship is and helps to maintain the neutral tone. The talk page mentioned examining where the word ally is derived from (alliance) and how it is applicable to the definition of allyship. I think this information could be added.
 * Sources:
 * 1) Kalina, Peter. “Performative Allyship.” Technium Social Sciences Journal, vol. 11, 2020, pp. 478–81, https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v11i1.1518.
 * 2) Becker, Jenifer. “Active Allyship.” Public Services Quarterly, vol. 13, no. 1, Routledge, 2017, pp. 27–31, https://doi.org/10.1080/15228959.2016.1261638.
 * 1) Kalina, Peter. “Performative Allyship.” Technium Social Sciences Journal, vol. 11, 2020, pp. 478–81, https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v11i1.1518.
 * 2) Becker, Jenifer. “Active Allyship.” Public Services Quarterly, vol. 13, no. 1, Routledge, 2017, pp. 27–31, https://doi.org/10.1080/15228959.2016.1261638.

Option 3

 * Article title:
 * Race Ethnicity and Education
 * Article Evaluation:
 * The content is relevant to the article topic and it is written with a neutral tone. Claims are cited and the citations look reputable. The page itself has very little information, and is therefore an underdeveloped article.
 * Sources:
 * 1) Race, Ethnicity and Education (Online). Carfax International Publishers, 1998.
 * 2) Race, Richard, and Vini Lander. Advancing Race and Ethnicity in Education. Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.
 * 1) Race, Ethnicity and Education (Online). Carfax International Publishers, 1998.
 * 2) Race, Richard, and Vini Lander. Advancing Race and Ethnicity in Education. Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.

Option 4

 * Article title:
 * Liberal feminism
 * Article Evaluation:
 * The content is relevant to the article topic and it is written with a neutral tone. Claims are cited and the citations look reputable. I think something that could definitely be improved is the overall organization of the page. The introduction paragraph is quite large and I think even just incorporating more paragraph breaks would make the content easy to read and process.
 * Sources:
 * 1) Marilley, Suzanne M. Woman Suffrage and the Origins of Liberal Feminism in the United States, 1820-1920. Harvard University Press, 1996.
 * 2) Eisenstein, Zillah R. The Radical Future of Liberal Feminism. [1993 ed.], Northeastern University Press, 1993.
 * 1) Marilley, Suzanne M. Woman Suffrage and the Origins of Liberal Feminism in the United States, 1820-1920. Harvard University Press, 1996.
 * 2) Eisenstein, Zillah R. The Radical Future of Liberal Feminism. [1993 ed.], Northeastern University Press, 1993.

Option 5

 * Article title:
 * Equity feminism
 * Article Evaluation:
 * The content is relevant to the article topic and it is written with a neutral tone. Claims are cited and the citations look reputable. The bottom two sections of the article could either be removed or provide more evidence. The presence of them doesn't seem to add much specificity to the topic. I think other areas of the article could also have more information added to them, such as contrasting equity feminism with various other feminisms to see what makes it specifically unique.
 * Sources:
 * 1) https://www.pipelineequity.com/voices-for-equity/gender-equity-vs-gender-equality/
 * 2) https://www.unwomen.org/en/news/stories/2020/6/explainer-intersectional-feminism-what-it-means-and-why-it-matters
 * 1) https://www.pipelineequity.com/voices-for-equity/gender-equity-vs-gender-equality/
 * 2) https://www.unwomen.org/en/news/stories/2020/6/explainer-intersectional-feminism-what-it-means-and-why-it-matters