User:Tessatrouchon/sandbox

Evaluating an article:

I chose to evaluate the wikipedia page for Hagia Sophia.

After looking over this article I have noticed it is full of information, I looked at the sources and most of them seem to be scholarly. There is a few from journals such as The New York Times, and in those incidences the sources are all scholarly. But none of the sources seem to come from anywhere that are completely terrible. Some of the photos in the gallery seem to need cited or as if they could have more information detailing what is in the photo.

The organization of this article is something I enjoy. Each section clearly has a header with related information below. The section detailing the mosaics lists each mosaic with information relating to the mosaic to the side and photos of each mosaic next to the information. The organization of that section makes information easy to absorb.

Under Notable Elements and symbols each door is listed with a description of the door, this shows the depth of information put into this article.

Some of the information, such as the beginning section is loaded with information that I think could be split up better so it's not such a bulk of information. The less organized it looks the harder the information seems to be to understand.

Overall a great article with a lot of information from many scholarly sources.