User:Tessiosepovici/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title: Tampax :
 * Article Evaluation
 * -Lead section is okay for what information is provided, which is just the history of tampax
 * -Content: Not up to date. It has no relevance to today, the different types of products tampax sells, what people say about tampax
 * -Tone is neutral but that is because there is barely any information
 * -Citations: No, wikipedia says additional citations are needed
 * -Organization: Yes but that is because there is only one section
 * -Images: One image of the logo
 * -Talk Page: Not a whole lot of activity. It is rated under Women's Health as a "start" but "low importance"
 * -Overall impression: I think the article is underdeveloped for how popular of a brand this is for feminine hygiene. :
 * Sources
 * https://www.cnn.com/cnn-underscored/health-fitness/best-period-products-for-exercise:

Option 2

 * Article title: Calvin Klein (fashion house) :
 * Article Evaluation:
 * Lead section: I think the article has a good lead section describing what Calvin Klein is, what the brand sells, the designers who founded it, and how it is still relevant today being a multi billion brand.
 * Tone and balance: Yes and no. The article definitely describes the basics about the brand but there is also references of conflicts slipped into random areas of writing. The language used makes it sound like there is only one person who was the victim
 * Sources: Wikipedia says the page needs more citations for verification
 * Organization: I think this article is pretty easy to read and follows chronological order
 * Images: Too many images of the same logo
 * Talk Page: Not much discussion going on but it is labeled as start class and mid importance on the WikiProjects its in
 * Overall impressions: The main thing I think this article needs work on is the controversies section about Brooke Shields. I think much more information could go into that, and I think it was a pretty big deal and wikipedia is not giving it the coverage it should have.
 * Sources:
 * https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/03/style/brooke-shields-pretty-baby.html?searchResultPosition=1
 * https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/03/style/brooke-shields-pretty-baby.html?searchResultPosition=1

Option 3

 * Article title: Kotex :
 * Article Evaluation
 * Lead: The lead is good for the information the article has, but if the article were to be updated to show the new products Kotex has or the things kotex stands for it might need to be updated
 * Content: I think the content could be updated because the main source of information is about the history of Kotex and how it was founded/got popular
 * Tone and Balance: I think the tone is neutral
 * Sources: There are a good amount of sources for the little information the page holds
 * Organization: There is really only one big section and that is the history
 * Images: A couple of varying images, some are cartoon/drawings
 * Talk Pages: It is on low importance for brands and women's health
 * Overall impressions: It has a good amount of information on the history but nothing relevant to today or the U by Kotex brand which is carried in most pharmacies or grocery stores. There is also nothing on the message that U by Kotex puts out there.
 * Sources:
 * https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/kimberly-clark-introduces-u-by-kotex-product-line-87782122.html:

Option 4

 * Article title:
 * Article Evaluation:
 * Sources:

Option 5

 * Article title:
 * Article Evaluation:
 * Sources: