User:Textavour/Shonda Rhimes/Alexjacullo Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Shonda Rhimes
 * Shonda Rhimes

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The article overall is very well-developed and detailed already since Shonda Rhimes is such a visible figure in the media industry. This might make it particularly difficult to find ways to contribute or to have these contributions approved by those who monitor the page stringently.

The lead section is concise and the rest of the article content is thorough and current. The tone of the article is very neutral and fact-based, including a wide array of reliable sources referenced throughout. The references are also recent and up to date. The article is well-written with no obvious errors in grammar, spelling, etc. The filmography chart is an aspect of the article that I thought was very useful.