User:Teyofi/Duodenal atresia/Bkp0061 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Teyofi


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Duodenal atresia
 * **I reviewed this article earlier in their "talk" section when it was originally assigned. Since that, the rubric was standardized. This is the more standardized review.

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead

The lead of this article is clear and succinct. The lead is not necessarily concise but has a good introductory sentence and contains info about each section without providing information that is not discussed later in the article.

Content

All of the content is relevant to the topic and up to date with no significant gaps. It does not address WikiMeds equity gap. It would be nice to have another section specifically regarding the pathophysiology/pathology.

Tone and Balance

The content is neutral, not biased towards a particular position- no viewpoint is over/under represented. There is nothing missing or out of place.

Sources and references

The sources checked are appropriate to the content and represent a variety of authors. The sources are slightly outdated- it may be appropriate to source material from newer journals/textbooks.

Organization

The content is well written, without any obvious grammatical or spelling errors. The added content is very well organized- the page is easy and pleasant to navigate/read.

Images/Media

The image added is appropriate and enhances understanding of the topic.

Overall Impression

Article looks great! I think there could be more to add but overall I think it's a solid overview of the topic.