User:Tfranji/Liberation psychology/Kassidiamos Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Tfranji


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Tfranji/Liberation psychology

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead seems pretty strong and clear. The content added to this article is easy to read and up to date. The tone throughout this article is neutral and has no biased views within the article. There's a few sources that are incomplete. Some are missing the dates but, the sources are relevant and thorough. The links do work. All of the content added is backed up by reliable sources which contribute insightful words. The sources are also current. The content of this article is well written and organized appropriately. The images in this article are relevant and laid out in a logical and visually appealing way. The images are also meaningful in understanding the topic.

I'm not really sure what was specifically added on some parts of the article. However, overall I think this is a strong article. The content is relevant to the topic and provides detailed examples within the sub sections.