User:Tglaze2/sandbox

Evaluating Articles and Sources

In both the articles the writer did a great job at sticking to the topic and providing in depth information. I think the article about digital divide in America is more informative than the one about Canada. Both articles had neutral information, stating only facts and helpful information to the reader. I believe that there were different viewpoints but just because of the different countries, none of the information was opinionated. Links were helpful for the most part and lead you to more information about the particular topic. Looking at the edit source you can see both articles have had multiple edits and been changed to provide accurate information. This shows that the information can be reliable and most likely correct.