User:ThaiMilkTea/Central Valley (California)/Lexi10656 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Nmart28, Js4111, Emmayoun9, Jenniferguerra514, ThaiMilkTea


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:ThaiMilkTea/Central_Valley_(California)?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Central Valley (California)

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead: The lead has a good amount of organized information and had introduction sentences for each subheading. It includes brief descriptions of the articles sections and fills in gaps for missing information from the original article. The lead is perfectly detailed as there are different types of information leading from hydrography, poverty, and environment change and immigrant employment. The information is clear and accurately describes the article's topic.

Content: The content added is relevant to the topic as there are subheadings within each heading that relates to the heading and the original topic of the central valley and immigrants. The content is up to date as there is a good amount of information that are from more recent articles cited. I believe that the content added was relevant to the topic and belongs to be in the wikipedia article.

Tone and Balance: The content added is neutral, however most of the information does go to show the negative affects on immigrants through environmental changes in the central valley. There is a good amount of information that is reliable enough to say that the tone id neutral, but the viewpoints presented do seem to slightly side with immigrants more as most of the information is released on how immigrants are affected in the central valley.

Sources and References: There are a good amount of sources that seem reliable as the sources cited are more recent which means the information researched should be up to date. The links do work and seem to be scholarly. They do reflect on the literature of the topic and there is a diverse spectrum of authors.

Organization: The article is well organized and is easy to read. There are no spelling errors or grammar that is wrong. It is broken down into sections which makes it clear and very organized to distinguish information.

Images and Media: There was only one image added, however I do not see it to be relevant to the information and there was no description under it explain why or what the image describes.

Overall Impression: The information added improved the quality of the article as it added valuable information to how immigrants are affected in the central valley. The strengths of the content added is that the information seems to be very reliable considering the sources and how clear the information was stated in each heading and subheading. The content added can be improved by adding images that relate to the topic and headings added.