User:Thanhthe3200/Bent's rule/1597 CE Peer Review

General info
Thanhthe3200 and KTCpscChem
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:Bent's rule draft
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Bent's rule

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Content


 * the added content is relevant and up to date
 * A lot of the sentences feel repetitive
 * Unless Wang et. al. and Dubois et. al. are pioneers in the field, mentioning their names and research directly feel out of place and biased towards their research

Sources


 * Sources are current except for an early article for Bent
 * The links work

Writing


 * I find this sentence confusing: "This electron distance maximization happens because all electrons are negatively charged, and like charges repel each other."
 * There is an extra space between molecule and geometry: "Furthermore, it has been shown that Bent’s rule corroborates quantum mechanical computations when describing molecule  geometry."
 * The writing in the applications section is a bit dense and could be further split up into more sections or more paragraphs

Images


 * If the table with 3D images is entirely replacing the table with static structures, include both the 3D and 2D images. It is harder to quickly determine the structure of the molecule from the 3D images
 * Is there anyway to make the 3D images static and then rotatable by readers? The constant rotation is distracting