User:Thanhthe3200/Bent's rule/Chmi1 Peer Review

General info
Thanhthe3200, KTCpscChem
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Thanhthe3200/Bent's rule
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Bent's rule

Evaluate the drafted changes
I really liked how you incorporated 3D models into your page. It really highlights understanding Bent's rule, and is very interactive for the reader. Your draft was well written, and demonstrates a high understanding of the topic. The added information is conveyed in a clear manner, with a neutral tone, which allows the reader to understand the theory behind Bent's rule. The coverage was well balanced, up-to-date, and is consistently cited with reputable and relevant sources. The draft adds informative and necessary details to the existing article. Great work!

I've noticed that you are using subscripts to cite your statements. One thing you can incorporate into your article is using Wikipedia's built in citation tool to link the citations to the references list. You can find this next to the bullet points on the toolbar.

Another thing you can add are links to other articles. For example, you can add a link to the VSEPR Wikipedia article in your paragraph comparing VSEPR and Bent's rule. You can also find this on the toolbar, with a "link" symbol.

In the last paragraph of "Applications of Bent's Rule", one minor stylistic adjustment can be on the sentence structure. Multiple sentences begin with a variation of the names of the authors, such as "Grabowski" or "Wang et. al.", which can seem repetitive for the reader. You could incorporate other ways of conveying which study the information was from, while also adding transition words to strengthen the cohesiveness of the article. This can improve the overall flow of the paragraph.