User:ThatSuperNerd/sandbox

Standards that we have to meet: 1. Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself.

This criterion includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, magazine articles, online versions of print media, and television documentaries except for the following:

- Any reprints of press releases, other publications where the musician or ensemble talks about themselves, and all advertising that mentions the musician or ensemble, including manufacturers' advertising.

- Works consisting merely of trivial coverage, such as articles that simply report performance dates, release information or track listings, or the publications of contact and booking details in directories.

- Articles in a school or university newspaper (or similar), in most cases. This is a university newspaper but its popculture commentary and editorial abilities might actually put it over the top https://www.highlandernews.org/37953/the-engrossing-sounds-of-red-voxs-ozymandias-and-a-discussion-with-the-bands-lead-vocalist/ Working on it

2. Has had a single or album on any country's national music chart. [maybe look at this source: https://www.top-charts.com/r/realign-red-vox

3. Has had a record certified gold or higher in at least one country.

4. Has received non-trivial coverage in independent reliable sources of an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one sovereign country.[note 4] Has released two or more albums on a major record label or on one of the more important indie labels (i.e., an independent label with a history of more than a few years, and with a roster of performers, many of whom are independently notable).

5. Is an ensemble that contains two or more independently notable musicians, or is a musician who has been a reasonably prominent member of two or more independently notable ensembles. ''This should be adapted appropriately for musical genre; for example, having performed two lead roles at major opera houses. Note that this criterion needs to be interpreted with caution, as there have been instances where this criterion was cited in a circular manner to create a self-fulfilling notability loop (e.g. musicians who were "notable" only for having been in two bands, of which one or both were "notable" only because those musicians had been in them.)''

6. Has become one of the most prominent representatives of a notable style or the most prominent of the local scene of a city; note that the subject must still meet all ordinary Wikipedia standards, including verifiability.

7. Has won or been nominated for a major music award, such as a Grammy, Juno, Mercury, Choice or Grammis award.

8. Has won first, second or third place in a major music competition.

9. Has performed music for a work of media that is notable, e.g., a theme for a network television show, performance in a television show or notable film, inclusion on a notable compilation album, etc. (But if this is the only claim, it is probably more appropriate to have a mention in the main article and redirect to that article. Read the policy and notability guideline on subjects notable only for one event, for further clarifications). Jacob is going to look into this

10. Has been placed in rotation nationally by a major radio or music television network.

11. Has been a featured subject of a substantial broadcast segment across a national radio or television network.

References: https://www.highlandernews.org/37953/the-engrossing-sounds-of-red-voxs-ozymandias-and-a-discussion-with-the-bands-lead-vocalist/

http://www.beyondthestagemagazine.com/new-music-monday-red-vox/

https://heavymag.com.au/interview-basking-another-light-red-vox/

Maybe chart topper? - https://www.top-charts.com/r/realign-red-vox