User:The86Juse/Northern muriqui/Frozenbanana97 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

The86Juse


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:The86Juse/Northern_muriqui?preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Northern muriqui

Lead
The lead does not yet seem to be updated to reflect new content added.

Content
The content added is relevant to the topic at hand, some of the citations are a bit old (1990's and 2000's) but not necessarily bad.

Tone and Balance
Tone is neutral, and no bias is found, good job!

Sources and References
Sources seem backed up and thorough, some of the citations are a bit old (1990's and 2000's) but not necessarily bad. All sources are peer reviewed and the links work.

Organization
Content is clear and well written.

Overall Impressions
Overall is well done, still needs some work in the lead and diet sections however. Sourcing is thorough and the added content reflects this.