User:TheBigPurplePeopleEater/Kimberlite/Sharleen Lawrence Peer Review

General info
(provide username): TheBigPurplePeopleEater
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:TheBigPurplePeopleEater/Kimberlite?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Kimberlite

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.) Clarity:

- There is no paragraphs to understand the information derived from the article

- Would suggest a leading paragraph which includes information from the different sub-headings from original article

Structure:

- there is three heading that indicate the three main areas in the article which is good (Lead, article body, references)

- should add more headings in terms of main topic of Kimberlite

- there is no clear structure that can be seen at the moment

Balanced Coverage/Neutrality:

- to information added to determine coverage and neutrality

Sources:

There are no sources listed

Suggested Improvements:

Add to the article heading listed

Add peer-reviewed sources (scientific journals)

Make sure you references

start adding information